R.T. Ellington

30 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

R.T. Ellington
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 112
  • Fuel Technology 8
  • Marketing 48
  • Biomedical Engineering 232
  • Strategy and Management 77
Replace A.A. Boni with:
A.A. Boni United States
Rakesh Srivastava India
Hu Wang China
Wendong Wu China
Philippe Marier Canada
E.L. Dougherty United States
Lilis Yuliati Indonesia
Maria Priscila Pessanha de Castro Brazil
James H. Gary United States
Boyu Liu China
R.T. Ellington relative to A.A. Boni United States A.A. Boni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
A.A. Boni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.T. Ellington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.T. Ellington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.T. Ellington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.T. Ellington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.T. Ellington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.T. Ellington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.T. Ellington. The network helps show where R.T. Ellington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside R.T. Ellington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.T. Ellington Line = papers co-authored together R.T. Ellington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199744
2 196540
3 196537
4
Liquid Fuels from Coal
197737
5 196236
6 196332
7 196028
8 200020
9 196419
10 196419
11 196417
12 196414
13 199313
14 199711
15 196311
16 19997
17 20016
18 20006
19 19645
20 19595

About R.T. Ellington

R.T. Ellington is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Spectroscopy, Mechanical Engineering and Strategy and Management, having authored 32 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (9 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (6 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (4 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (3 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (3 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (3 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (3 papers) and Combustion and flame dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (112 citations), Fuel Technology (8 citations), Marketing (48 citations), Biomedical Engineering (232 citations) and Strategy and Management (77 citations). R.T. Ellington has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include K.E. Starling, Mark P. Sharfman, James P. Dolan, Dimitri Gidaspow, Teresa M. Shaft, Kenneth B. Bischoff and R.E. Peck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, AIChE Journal, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Business Horizons and Separation Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact