7.1k total citations 143 papers, 2.6k citations indexed
About
Roy Porter is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science and Clinical Psychology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Roy Porter has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in History, 15 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 12 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Roy Porter's work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (12 papers), History of Science and Natural History (12 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (12 papers). Roy Porter is often cited by papers focused on Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (12 papers), History of Science and Natural History (12 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (12 papers). Roy Porter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Roy Porter's co-authors include Mikuláš Teich, W. F. Bynum, Peter Burke, G. S. Rousseau, Ludmilla Jordanova, L. S. Jacyna, William Bynum, Christopher Fox, Robert Wokler and Dorothy Porter and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Lancet and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
In The Last Decade
Roy Porter
126 papers
receiving
1.8k citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Roy Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roy Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roy Porter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roy Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roy Porter. The network helps show where Roy Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roy Porter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roy Porter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roy Porter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roy Porter. Roy Porter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Porter, Roy. (2011). The popularization of medicine, 1650-1850. Routledge eBooks.9 indexed citations
2.
Porter, Roy. (2010). Geschiedenis van de geneeskunde.
3.
Porter, Roy. (2003). Breve historia de la locura. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 30(5). 383–5.16 indexed citations
4.
Porter, Roy, et al.. (2000). Die Kunst des Heilens : eine medizinische Geschichte der Menschheit von der Antike bis heute. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft eBooks.7 indexed citations
Bynum, William, Roy Porter, & L. S. Jacyna. (1994). Companion Encyclopaedia of the History of Medicine. Annals of Science. 51(4).85 indexed citations
11.
Porter, Roy. (1994). Is Dr Feelgood here to stay. TLS, the Times literary supplement/Times literary supplement on CD-ROM/TLS. Times literary supplement. 28.1 indexed citations
Porter, Roy. (1979). Medicine and the Enlightenment in Eighteenth century England.. PubMed. 25. 27–40.
20.
Andermann, Frédérick, et al.. (1978). Books Received. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques. 5(2). xvi–xvi.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.