Roy L. Hedden

874 total citations
35 papers, 683 citations indexed

About

Roy L. Hedden is a scholar working on Ecology, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Roy L. Hedden has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 683 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Ecology, 22 papers in Insect Science and 12 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Roy L. Hedden's work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (23 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (8 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (8 papers). Roy L. Hedden is often cited by papers focused on Forest Insect Ecology and Management (23 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (8 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (8 papers). Roy L. Hedden collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Roy L. Hedden's co-authors include Kenji Mori, Todd S. Fredericksen, Victor B. Shelburne, Ronald F. Billings, J. P. Vité, J. P. Vit�, Robert M. Allen, G. B. Pitman, T. L. Payne and D. Klimetzek and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Forest Ecology and Management and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

In The Last Decade

Roy L. Hedden

33 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Roy L. Hedden United States 16 392 390 166 163 125 35 683
Karen L. Lu United States 9 91 0.2× 70 0.2× 123 0.7× 320 2.0× 263 2.1× 12 579
Janne Suomela Finland 11 149 0.4× 252 0.6× 98 0.6× 266 1.6× 242 1.9× 17 604
Raffaello Giannini Italy 12 107 0.3× 185 0.5× 163 1.0× 246 1.5× 54 0.4× 38 524
Claudio Donoso Chile 12 78 0.2× 85 0.2× 154 0.9× 317 1.9× 147 1.2× 35 500
C. E. Ecroyd New Zealand 8 120 0.3× 125 0.3× 121 0.7× 172 1.1× 114 0.9× 11 405
M.G.L. van Nieuwstadt Netherlands 7 144 0.4× 153 0.4× 265 1.6× 314 1.9× 229 1.8× 9 643
Norton D. Addy United States 3 143 0.4× 241 0.6× 157 0.9× 198 1.2× 173 1.4× 6 461
Evan M. Gora United States 13 102 0.3× 95 0.2× 241 1.5× 213 1.3× 92 0.7× 33 463
Íñigo Granzow de la Cerda United States 10 48 0.1× 108 0.3× 152 0.9× 286 1.8× 112 0.9× 19 456
James Perrins United Kingdom 8 93 0.2× 141 0.4× 73 0.4× 219 1.3× 187 1.5× 9 499

Countries citing papers authored by Roy L. Hedden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roy L. Hedden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roy L. Hedden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roy L. Hedden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roy L. Hedden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roy L. Hedden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roy L. Hedden. The network helps show where Roy L. Hedden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roy L. Hedden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roy L. Hedden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roy L. Hedden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roy L. Hedden. Roy L. Hedden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Song, Bo, et al.. (2010). Three-Dimensional Landscape Visualizations: New Technique towards Wildfire and Forest Bark Beetle Management. Forests. 1(2). 82–98. 6 indexed citations
2.
Hedden, Roy L., et al.. (2009). Hemlock Susceptibility to Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Attack in the Chattooga River Watershed. Southeastern Naturalist. 8(1). 129–140. 6 indexed citations
3.
Hedden, Roy L., et al.. (2004). Impact of Prescribed Fire and Thinning on Host Resistance to the Southern Pine Beetle: Preliminary Results of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study. 4 indexed citations
4.
Straka, Thomas J., et al.. (1997). Costs Associated with Urban Gypsy Moth Control by Arborists: A Case Study. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 23(5). 173–180. 3 indexed citations
5.
Straka, Thomas J., et al.. (1997). Cost Analysis of a Specialized Gypsy Moth Management Program for Suburban Parks. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 14(1). 32–39. 2 indexed citations
6.
Shelburne, Victor B. & Roy L. Hedden. (1996). Effect of stem height, dominance class, and site quality on sapwood permeability in loblolly pine, (Pinus taeda L.). Forest Ecology and Management. 83(3). 163–169. 16 indexed citations
7.
Hedden, Roy L., et al.. (1995). Modeling the effect of crown shedding and streamlining on the survival of loblolly pine exposed to acute wind. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 25(5). 704–712. 35 indexed citations
8.
Fredericksen, Todd S., et al.. (1994). Effect of stem bending on hydraulic conductivity and wood strength of loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 24(3). 442–446. 20 indexed citations
9.
Hedden, Roy L., et al.. (1993). Management Strategies to Reduce Losses from the Southern Pine Beetle. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 17(3). 150–154. 29 indexed citations
10.
Hedden, Roy L., et al.. (1991). Relation of Nantucket Pine Tip Moth Attack and Fusiform Rust Infection in Loblolly Pine Families. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 15(4). 204–208. 2 indexed citations
11.
Hedden, Roy L., et al.. (1988). Potential Impact of the Southern Pine Beetle on Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Colonies in the Georgia Piedmont. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 12(3). 194–199. 2 indexed citations
12.
Hood, W. Michael, et al.. (1988). Hazard Rating Forest Sites for Pine Tip Moth, Rhyacionia spp., in the Upper Piedmont Plateau. Forest Science. 34(4). 1083–1093. 13 indexed citations
13.
Hedden, Roy L., et al.. (1987). Growth Impact of Pine Tip Moth on Loblolly Pine Plantations in the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 11(3). 128–133. 17 indexed citations
14.
Hood, W. Michael, C. Wayne Berisford, & Roy L. Hedden. (1985). OVIPOSITION PREFERENCES OF THE NANTUCKET PINE TIP MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) ON LOBLOLLY AND SLASH PINE. Journal of Entomological Science. 20(2). 204–206. 4 indexed citations
15.
Lynch, Ann M. & Roy L. Hedden. (1984). Relation between Early- and Late-Season Loblolly Pine Seedling Mortality from Pales and Pitcheating Weevil Attack in Southeast Oklahoma¹. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 8(3). 172–176. 2 indexed citations
16.
Roberts, E. A., et al.. (1982). Seasonal variation in laboratory response to behavioral chemicals of the southern pine beetle. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 8(3). 641–652. 9 indexed citations
17.
Payne, T. L., J. V. Richerson, Joseph C. Dickens, et al.. (1982). Southern pine beetle: Olfactory receptor and behavior discrimination of enantiomers of the attractant pheromone frontalin. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 8(5). 873–881. 42 indexed citations
18.
Hedden, Roy L.. (1978). Host Tree Spatial Pattern in a Southern Pine Beetle Infestation. The Southwestern Naturalist. 23(1). 71–71. 1 indexed citations
19.
Brand, J. M., et al.. (1977). Bark-beetle pheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 3(6). 657–666. 54 indexed citations
20.
Vité, J. P., et al.. (1976). Chirality of insect pheromones: Response interruption by inactive antipodes. Die Naturwissenschaften. 63(12). 582–583. 65 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen L. Lu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janne Suomela Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Raffaello Giannini Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Claudio Donoso Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. E. Ecroyd Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M.G.L. van Nieuwstadt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Norton D. Addy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Evan M. Gora Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Íñigo Granzow de la Cerda Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James Perrins
Rankless by CCL
2026