Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler

23 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
  • Clinical Psychology 453
  • General Health Professions 449
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 314
  • Sociology and Political Science 187
Replace Kristina Thomas with:
Kristina Thomas Australia
Makiko Sanjo Japan
Eduardo Garralda Spain
Tania Pastrana Germany
Helle Ussing Timm Denmark
Eric L. Krakauer United States
Danielle Goodwin United Kingdom
Denise Marshall Canada
Julian Abel United Kingdom
Polly Mazanec United States
Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler relative to Kristina Thomas Australia Kristina Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kristina Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler. The network helps show where Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler. Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 49
2 35
3 7
4 32
5 17
6 11
7 72
8 72
9 38
10 201
11 103
12 32
13 43
14 2
15 81
16 31
17 97
18 43
19 36
20
An Integrated Management System at the Connecticut Hospice
0

About Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler

Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (23 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (12 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (186 citations) and Clinical Psychology (453 citations). Rosemary Johnson‐Hürzeler has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Emily Cherlin, Elizabeth H. Bradley, Stanislav V. Kasl, Terri R. Fried, Holly G. Prigerson, Dena Schulman‐Green, Elizabeth H. Bradley, Sarah McCue Horwitz, Ruth McCorkle and Melissa Carlson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, The American Journal of Medicine and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026