Rose Gelineau‐Morel
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Mark JenkinsonValentina TomassiniJacqueline PalacePaul M. MatthewsHeidi Johansen‐BergTracy A. GlauserJennifer VannestThomas Maloney
- Topics
- Neurological disorders and treatments (7 papers)Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (6 papers)
- Journals
- BrainNeurologyPEDIATRICS
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
Rose Gelineau‐Morel
18 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 140
- Molecular Biology 105
- Cognitive Neuroscience 105
- Psychiatry and Mental health 99
- Neurology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Rose Gelineau‐Morel
This map shows the geographic impact of Rose Gelineau‐Morel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose Gelineau‐Morel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose Gelineau‐Morel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rose Gelineau‐Morel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose Gelineau‐Morel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose Gelineau‐Morel. The network helps show where Rose Gelineau‐Morel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rose Gelineau‐Morel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rose Gelineau‐Morel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rose Gelineau‐Morel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rose Gelineau‐Morel. Rose Gelineau‐Morel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | 111 | |
| 18 | 116 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Rose Gelineau‐Morel
Rose Gelineau‐Morel is a scholar working on Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological disorders and treatments (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (140 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (99 citations) and Neurology (87 citations). Rose Gelineau‐Morel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark Jenkinson, Valentina Tomassini, Jacqueline Palace, Paul M. Matthews, Heidi Johansen‐Berg, Tracy A. Glauser, Jennifer Vannest, Thomas Maloney, Jeffrey R. Tenney and Anthony Davidson. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Neurology and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.