Roos Vonk

3.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
55 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Roos Vonk is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Roos Vonk has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 32 papers in Social Psychology and 17 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Roos Vonk's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (32 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (15 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers). Roos Vonk is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (32 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (15 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers). Roos Vonk collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Roos Vonk's co-authors include Kristin D. Neff, Mariëlle Stel, Jaap Ham, Rick B. van Baaren, Ad van Knippenberg, Richard D. Ashmore, Glenn D. Reeder, Jim Blascovich, Cade McCall and Daniel C. Molden and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, American Psychologist and Journal of Organizational Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Roos Vonk

55 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Self‐Compassion Versus Global Self‐Esteem: Two Different ... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Roos Vonk Netherlands 25 1.2k 958 878 601 453 55 2.6k
Romin W. Tafarodi Canada 24 1.5k 1.2× 1.4k 1.4× 878 1.0× 506 0.8× 336 0.7× 39 3.1k
Jim Fultz United States 23 1.7k 1.4× 1.1k 1.1× 1.0k 1.1× 424 0.7× 698 1.5× 37 3.3k
Aiden P. Gregg United Kingdom 23 1.4k 1.2× 1.3k 1.3× 1.1k 1.3× 643 1.1× 542 1.2× 48 2.9k
Lauri A. Jensen‐Campbell United States 22 1.6k 1.3× 929 1.0× 1.6k 1.8× 667 1.1× 209 0.5× 41 2.9k
Glenn Wilson 3 1.1k 0.9× 738 0.8× 1.1k 1.3× 777 1.3× 278 0.6× 6 2.7k
Michelle Yik Hong Kong 22 1.2k 1.0× 539 0.6× 709 0.8× 802 1.3× 340 0.8× 49 2.3k
Sing Lau Hong Kong 33 1.3k 1.1× 688 0.7× 1.2k 1.3× 988 1.6× 243 0.5× 69 3.4k
Jochen E. Gebauer Germany 31 1.8k 1.5× 1.4k 1.5× 1.1k 1.3× 556 0.9× 301 0.7× 63 3.3k
Seger M. Breugelmans Netherlands 28 1.9k 1.5× 1.3k 1.4× 545 0.6× 394 0.7× 766 1.7× 63 3.3k
Kenneth D. Locke United States 25 1.2k 1.0× 760 0.8× 882 1.0× 485 0.8× 226 0.5× 69 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Roos Vonk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roos Vonk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roos Vonk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roos Vonk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roos Vonk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roos Vonk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roos Vonk. The network helps show where Roos Vonk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roos Vonk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roos Vonk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roos Vonk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roos Vonk. Roos Vonk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vonk, Roos, et al.. (2021). A communicational approach to enhance open-mindedness towards meat-refusers. Appetite. 167. 105602–105602. 10 indexed citations
2.
Vonk, Roos, et al.. (2020). An exploration of spiritual superiority: The paradox of self‐enhancement. European Journal of Social Psychology. 51(1). 152–165. 12 indexed citations
3.
Vonk, Roos, et al.. (2019). BIM and Circular Design. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. 225. 12068–12068. 13 indexed citations
4.
Stel, Mariëlle & Roos Vonk. (2010). Mimicry in social interaction: Benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction. British Journal of Psychology. 101(2). 311–323. 166 indexed citations
5.
Ham, Jaap & Roos Vonk. (2010). Impressions of impression management: Evidence of spontaneous suspicion of ulterior motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 47(2). 466–471. 27 indexed citations
6.
Neff, Kristin D. & Roos Vonk. (2008). Self‐Compassion Versus Global Self‐Esteem: Two Different Ways of Relating to Oneself. Journal of Personality. 77(1). 23–50. 852 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Stel, Mariëlle, Rick B. van Baaren, & Roos Vonk. (2007). Effects of mimicking: acting prosocially by being emotionally moved. European Journal of Social Psychology. 38(6). 965–976. 116 indexed citations
8.
Vonk, Roos & Richard D. Ashmore. (2003). Thinking about gender types: Cognitive organization of female and male types. British Journal of Social Psychology. 42(2). 257–280. 24 indexed citations
9.
Vonk, Roos. (2002). Effects of stereotypes on attitude inference: Outgroups are black and white, ingroups are shaded. British Journal of Social Psychology. 41(1). 157–167. 8 indexed citations
10.
Vonk, Roos. (2002). Self-serving interpretations of flattery: Why ingratiation works.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 82(4). 515–526. 118 indexed citations
11.
Vonk, Roos. (1999). Differential evaluations of likeable and dislikeable behaviours enacted towards superiors and subordinates. European Journal of Social Psychology. 29(2-3). 139–146. 20 indexed citations
12.
Vonk, Roos, et al.. (1998). Intergroup bias and correspondence bias: People engage in situational correction when it suits them. British Journal of Social Psychology. 37(3). 379–385. 10 indexed citations
13.
Vonk, Roos. (1998). Effects of Cooperative and Competitive Outcome Dependency on Attention and Impression Preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 34(3). 265–288. 24 indexed citations
14.
Vonk, Roos, et al.. (1998). Comment on Wagner, Elejabarrieta and Lahnsteiner (1995): From sperm and ovum to gender stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology. 28(1). 115–121. 2 indexed citations
15.
Vonk, Roos. (1998). The slime effect: Suspicion and dislike of likeable behavior toward superiors.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74(4). 849–864. 133 indexed citations
16.
Vonk, Roos, et al.. (1998). Gender subgroups: intergroup bias within the sexes. European Journal of Social Psychology. 28(1). 37–47. 4 indexed citations
17.
Vonk, Roos. (1998). Effects of Behavioral Causes and Consequences on Person Judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 24(10). 1065–1074. 11 indexed citations
18.
Vonk, Roos & Ad van Knippenberg. (1995). Processing attitude statements from in-group and out-group members: Effects of within-group and within-person inconsistencies on reading times.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68(2). 215–227. 24 indexed citations
19.
Vonk, Roos & Ad van Knippenberg. (1994). The Sovereignty of Negative Inferences: Suspicion of Ulterior Motives Does Not Reduce the Negativity Effect. Social Cognition. 12(3). 169–186. 27 indexed citations
20.
Vonk, Roos. (1993). Individual differences and common dimensions in Implicit Personality Theory. British Journal of Social Psychology. 32(3). 209–226. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026