Ronica Mukerjee
About
In The Last Decade
Ronica Mukerjee
5 papers receiving 101 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Social Psychology 81
- Sociology and Political Science 29
- Gender Studies 26
- Reproductive Medicine 24
- Clinical Psychology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Ronica Mukerjee
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronica Mukerjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronica Mukerjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronica Mukerjee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ronica Mukerjee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronica Mukerjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronica Mukerjee. The network helps show where Ronica Mukerjee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ronica Mukerjee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ronica Mukerjee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ronica Mukerjee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ronica Mukerjee. Ronica Mukerjee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 14 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.