Ronald P. Wilder
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Accounting top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Marketing
- Co-authors
- Irvin B. TuckerPaula VeigaDavinder SinghPhilip JacobsScott KlarenbachSumit R. MajumdarWilliam O. BeardenLouis H. Amato
- Topics
- Merger and Competition Analysis (5 papers)Global trade and economics (5 papers)Economic Growth and Productivity (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaPortugal
In The Last Decade
Ronald P. Wilder
23 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Economics and Econometrics 225
- Accounting 100
- Strategy and Management 90
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 64
- Marketing 39
Countries citing papers authored by Ronald P. Wilder
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald P. Wilder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald P. Wilder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald P. Wilder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ronald P. Wilder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald P. Wilder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald P. Wilder. The network helps show where Ronald P. Wilder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ronald P. Wilder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ronald P. Wilder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ronald P. Wilder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ronald P. Wilder. Ronald P. Wilder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Cross-Sectional Price Equation: Reply | 0 |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 65 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | The Price Equation: A Cross-Sectional Approach | 23 |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 76 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Ronald P. Wilder
Ronald P. Wilder is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting, having authored 24 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (5 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (100 citations), Economics and Econometrics (225 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (64 citations). Ronald P. Wilder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Irvin B. Tucker, Paula Veiga, Davinder Singh, Philip Jacobs, Scott Klarenbach, Sumit R. Majumdar, William O. Bearden, Louis H. Amato, Stanley R. Stansell and Philip Jacobs. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Journal of Health Economics and Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.