Ron Weber

7.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
103 papers, 5.1k citations indexed

About

Ron Weber is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Ron Weber has authored 103 papers receiving a total of 5.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Management Information Systems, 34 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 29 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Ron Weber's work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (26 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (20 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (20 papers). Ron Weber is often cited by papers focused on Semantic Web and Ontologies (26 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (20 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (20 papers). Ron Weber collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Canada. Ron Weber's co-authors include Yair Wand, Izak Benbasat, Iris Vessey, Andrew Burton‐Jones, Veda C. Storey, Oliver Mußhoff, Graeme Shanks, François Bodart, Marta Indulska and Peter Green and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Management Science and Communications of the ACM.

In The Last Decade

Ron Weber

100 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Hit Papers

Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual M... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ron Weber Australia 34 2.5k 2.3k 2.1k 941 880 103 5.1k
Yair Wand Canada 31 2.5k 1.0× 2.5k 1.1× 2.4k 1.2× 526 0.6× 1000 1.1× 88 5.2k
Jan Mendling Austria 41 5.9k 2.4× 4.3k 1.9× 2.4k 1.1× 378 0.4× 705 0.8× 303 7.6k
Michael Rosemann Australia 41 4.7k 1.9× 2.6k 1.1× 1.3k 0.6× 640 0.7× 387 0.4× 290 6.8k
Veda C. Storey United States 27 933 0.4× 1.3k 0.6× 1.6k 0.8× 464 0.5× 897 1.0× 177 3.5k
Mario Piattini Spain 44 2.3k 0.9× 5.7k 2.5× 2.5k 1.2× 601 0.6× 1.6k 1.8× 639 8.3k
Ricardo Colomo‐Palacios Spain 35 791 0.3× 2.0k 0.9× 1.1k 0.5× 520 0.6× 633 0.7× 296 4.6k
Iris Vessey United States 36 1.9k 0.8× 2.1k 0.9× 1.1k 0.5× 1.1k 1.2× 325 0.4× 83 6.5k
Richard Hull United States 41 1.3k 0.5× 2.6k 1.1× 4.1k 2.0× 514 0.5× 4.3k 4.8× 191 8.0k
Brian Fitzgerald Ireland 42 1.5k 0.6× 4.2k 1.8× 747 0.4× 872 0.9× 650 0.7× 272 6.8k
Alexander Maedche Germany 45 825 0.3× 3.1k 1.4× 4.5k 2.2× 1.0k 1.1× 1.0k 1.2× 246 7.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Ron Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ron Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ron Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ron Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ron Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ron Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ron Weber. The network helps show where Ron Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ron Weber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ron Weber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ron Weber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ron Weber. Ron Weber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weber, Ron. (2023). Some Prognostications: Artificial Intelligence and Accounting. Australian Accounting Review. 33(2). 110–113.
2.
Mußhoff, Oliver, et al.. (2023). Farmers’ preference for digital credit: Does the delivery channel matter?. GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen). 3(1). 6 indexed citations
3.
King, John Leslie, Edgar A. Whitley, Ron Weber, et al.. (2014). The King is Dead! Long Live the King! Homelessness and Survival in the IS Field. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1. 2. 1 indexed citations
4.
Burton‐Jones, Andrew, et al.. (2012). Is Use of Optional Attributes and Associations in Conceptual Modeling Always Problematic? Theory and Empirical Tests. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast). 4. 3041–3056. 7 indexed citations
5.
Weber, Ron. (2012). Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 13(1). 1–30. 237 indexed citations
6.
Valacich, Joseph S., et al.. (2007). Increasing the Number of A+ Published Papers in the Information Systems Discipline: Improving the Journal Review Process. ResearchSpace (University of Auckland). 1 indexed citations
7.
Weber, Ron. (2004). Editor's comments: the rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view. MIS Quarterly. 28(1). 61 indexed citations
8.
Weber, Ron. (2004). Editor's comments: some implications of the year-2000 Era, dot-com Era, and offshoring for information systems pedagogy. MIS Quarterly. 28(2). 14 indexed citations
9.
Weber, Ron. (2003). Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact. MIS Quarterly. 27(2). 81 indexed citations
10.
Weber, Ron. (2003). Editor's comment: the reflexive researcher. MIS Quarterly. 27(4). 6 indexed citations
11.
Weber, Ron. (2002). Conceptual modelling and ontology: Possibilities and pitfalls. Lecture notes in computer science. 2503. 1–2. 1 indexed citations
12.
Shanks, Graeme, et al.. (2002). Representing Part-Whole Relationships in Conceptual Modeling: An Empirical Evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 17(11). 89–100. 17 indexed citations
13.
Burton‐Jones, Andrew & Ron Weber. (1999). Understanding relationships with attributes in entity-relationship diagrams. International Conference on Information Systems. 214–228. 54 indexed citations
14.
Weber, Ron, et al.. (1998). Stakeholder experiences with conceptual modeling: an empirical investigation. International Conference on Information Systems. 370–375. 8 indexed citations
15.
Bodart, François & Ron Weber. (1996). Optional Properties Versus Subtyping in Conceptual Modeling: A Theory and Empirical Test. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 37. 7 indexed citations
16.
Weber, Ron, et al.. (1995). The Impact of IT Infusion and Diffusion on Some Characteristics of IS Planning: A Model and An Empirical Test. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 207–214. 3 indexed citations
17.
Weber, Ron & Yanchun Zhang. (1991). An ontological evaluation of Niam's grammar for conceptual schema diagrams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 75–82. 18 indexed citations
18.
Wand, Yair & Ron Weber. (1991). A unified model of software and data decomposition. International Conference on Information Systems. 101–110. 8 indexed citations
19.
Wand, Yair & Ron Weber. (1990). TOWARD A THEORY OF THE DEEP STRUCTURE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3. 65 indexed citations
20.
Wand, Yair & Ron Weber. (1988). AN ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SOME FUNDAMENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONCEPTS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 35. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026