Romain Neugebauer
- Statistics and Probability top 1%
- Oncology top 10%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark van der LaanMark J. van der LaanIra B. TagerJulie A. SchmittdielKathleen MortimerRichard W. GrantMichael J. SilverbergKelly L. Moore
- Topics
- Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (25 papers)Statistical Methods and Inference (18 papers)Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (12 papers)
- Journals
- JAMAJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Romain Neugebauer
88 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Statistics and Probability 441
- Oncology 411
- Epidemiology 291
- General Health Professions 258
- Physiology 224
Countries citing papers authored by Romain Neugebauer
This map shows the geographic impact of Romain Neugebauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Romain Neugebauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Romain Neugebauer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Romain Neugebauer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Romain Neugebauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Romain Neugebauer. The network helps show where Romain Neugebauer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Romain Neugebauer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Romain Neugebauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Romain Neugebauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Romain Neugebauer. Romain Neugebauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 83 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 85 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 202 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 67 | |
| 19 | 95 | |
| 20 | 64 |
About Romain Neugebauer
Romain Neugebauer is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Family Practice and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (25 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (18 papers) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (441 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (197 citations) and Family Practice (48 citations). Romain Neugebauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Mark van der Laan, Mark J. van der Laan, Ira B. Tager, Julie A. Schmittdiel, Kathleen Mortimer, Richard W. Grant, Michael J. Silverberg, Kelly L. Moore, Daniel B. Klein and Wendy A. Leyden. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.