Roland Bol
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Software top 10%
- Information Systems
- Co-authors
- Krzysztof R. AptJan Willem KlopJohan BlomJan Friso GrooteMarc BezemY. ZhaoGuangmin XiaoJ. C. M. Baeten
- Topics
- Formal Methods in Verification (13 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (12 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwedenGermany
In The Last Decade
Roland Bol
18 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Artificial Intelligence 331
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 178
- Computer Networks and Communications 52
- Software 36
- Information Systems 33
Countries citing papers authored by Roland Bol
This map shows the geographic impact of Roland Bol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roland Bol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roland Bol more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roland Bol
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roland Bol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roland Bol. The network helps show where Roland Bol may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roland Bol
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roland Bol. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roland Bol based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roland Bol. Roland Bol is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 36 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Automatic Detection of Feature Interactions in Temporal Logic. | 27 |
| 5 | Loop checking in logic programming | 5 |
| 6 | A real time process logic | 1 |
| 7 | Logic programming and negation : a survey | 2 |
| 8 | 179 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | A real-time process logic | 3 |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | The meaning of negative premises in transition system specifications (extended abstract) | 8 |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Towards more efficient loop checks | 4 |
| 17 | On the Safe Termination of PROLOG Programs. | 14 |
| 18 | An analysis of loop checking mechanisms for logic programs | 3 |
About Roland Bol
Roland Bol is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 18 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (13 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (12 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (178 citations), Artificial Intelligence (331 citations) and Software (36 citations). Roland Bol has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Krzysztof R. Apt, Jan Willem Klop, Johan Blom, Jan Friso Groote, Marc Bezem, Y. Zhao, Guangmin Xiao, J. C. M. Baeten, Zhouli Liu and J.A. Bergstra. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of the ACM and Theoretical Computer Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.