Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders
20061.1k citationsDavid J. Pannell, Graham R. Marshall et al.Australian Journal of Experimental Agricultureprofile →
Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: A tool for research, extension and policy
2017251 citationsGeoff Kuehne, Rick Llewellyn et al.Agricultural Systemsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Roger Wilkinson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Wilkinson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Wilkinson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Wilkinson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Wilkinson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Wilkinson. The network helps show where Roger Wilkinson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roger Wilkinson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roger Wilkinson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roger Wilkinson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roger Wilkinson. Roger Wilkinson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Turner, LR, Roger Wilkinson, & Sue Kilpatrick. (2018). Recordkeeping helps increase farmer confidence to change practices. UTAS Research Repository.5 indexed citations
2.
Kuehne, Geoff, Rick Llewellyn, David J. Pannell, et al.. (2017). Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: A tool for research, extension and policy. Agricultural Systems. 156. 115–125.251 indexed citations breakdown →
Pannell, David J., Graham R. Marshall, Neil Barr, et al.. (2011). Adoption of Conservation Practices by Rural Landholders. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 72–78.8 indexed citations
Pannell, David J., Graham R. Marshall, Neil Barr, et al.. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 46(11). 1407–1407.1098 indexed citations breakdown →
Brown, Ross, et al.. (2003). Visitor books: a tool for planning and evaluating visitor management at rock art sites. ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University).1 indexed citations
14.
Wilkinson, Roger, et al.. (2002). \'The kids don\'t want to take over the farm\' : What\'s happening to the demographics of Victoria\'s wool industry?. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 50(3).1 indexed citations
Wilkinson, Roger & John Cary. (2002). Sustainability as an evolutionary process. International Journal of Sustainable Development. 5(4). 381–381.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.