Roger W. Doyle

3.2k citations
73 papers · 2.5k indexed · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Roger W. Doyle

72 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Roger W. Doyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Aquatic Science 870
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 910
  • Genetics 992
  • Physiology 159
  • Global and Planetary Change 692
Replace J. P. Thorpe with:
J. P. Thorpe United Kingdom
Michael H. Horn United States
John E. Graves United States
Odd Terje Sandlund Norway
Douglas F. Markle United States
N. Daan Netherlands
Elizabeth A. Marschall United States
Henrik Mosegaard Denmark
Clark Hubbs United States
Douglas P. Swain Canada
Roger W. Doyle relative to J. P. Thorpe United Kingdom J. P. Thorpe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
J. P. Thorpe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger W. Doyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger W. Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger W. Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger W. Doyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger W. Doyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger W. Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger W. Doyle. The network helps show where Roger W. Doyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roger W. Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger W. Doyle Line = papers co-authored together Roger W. Doyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201127
2 199998
3 199614
4
The use of DNA fingerprinting for high-intensity, within-family selection in fish breeding.
199437
5 199133
6 199012
7
Use of internal reference population for growth rate comparison of tilapia strains. I. In a crowded environment
19902
8 199077
9 19863
10 198681
11 198619
12 198528
13 198575
14 19855
15 198132
16 198135
17 19802
18 197435
19 197230
20 196824

About Roger W. Doyle

Roger W. Doyle is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Genetics and Oceanography, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (31 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (30 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (20 papers), Marine and fisheries research (15 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (11 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (8 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (870 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (910 citations), Genetics (992 citations), Physiology (159 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (692 citations). Roger W. Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Philippines and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel E. Ruzzante, Jonathan Wright, Doug Cook, Christophe M. Herbinger, Gary F. Newkirk, Jalindar D. Ambekar, A. Talbot, W. Hunte, Beren W. Robinson and Paul Bentzen. Their work appears in journals such as Aquaculture, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Marine Biology, Evolution and Limnology and Oceanography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026