Roger Mead

15 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers

Roger Mead
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Management Science and Operations Research 109
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 64
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 39
  • Statistics and Probability 29
  • Horticulture 3
Replace Marvin Lentner with:
Marvin Lentner United States
Sílvio Sandoval Zocchi Brazil
E. R. Williams Australia
Carmelo Rodríguez Spain
K. Hartmann Germany
AC Gleeson Australia
José Spain
Michael F. Driscoll United States
G. V. Dyke United States
Anı́bal M. Blanco Argentina
Roger Mead relative to Marvin Lentner United States Marvin Lentner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marvin Lentner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Mead. The network helps show where Roger Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Roger Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger Mead Line = papers co-authored together Roger Mead links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200176
2 201851
3 198636
4
Landsat classification accuracy assessment procedures
198233
5 199124
6 200611
7
Some new three-level orthogonal main effects plans robust to model uncertainty
20047
8 20127
9 20035
10 19925
11
Statistical isomorphism of three-level fractional factorial designs
20063
12 19903
13 20153
14 20152
15 20171
16 20170

About Roger Mead

Roger Mead is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability, Animal Science and Zoology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimal Experimental Design Methods (7 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (3 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers) and Silkworms and Sericulture Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (109 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (64 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (39 citations), Statistics and Probability (29 citations) and Horticulture (3 citations). Roger Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Taiwan and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Steven G. Gilmour, Kent M. Eskridge, Neil A. Butler, David Baird, Keith Dear, Janet Riley, Surya Prakash Singh, A.M. Wachira, R. N. Curnow and Anne Hasted. Their work appears in journals such as Biometrics, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Statistica Sinica and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact