Roger E. Moe
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 23
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 17
- Co-authors
- Benjamin O. Anderson (14 shared papers)Christopher I. Li (5 shared papers)Janet R. Daling (5 shared papers)David R. Byrd (7 shared papers)Raymond S. Yeung (5 shared papers)David A. Mankoff (6 shared papers)Mary Austin-Seymour (5 shared papers)Robert B. Livingston (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer (8 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (7 papers)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (4 papers)Radiology (2 papers)Journal of Surgical Oncology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Roger E. Moe
39 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cancer Research 1.4k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.0k
- Oncology 1.1k
- Dermatology 199
- Surgery 611
Countries citing papers authored by Roger E. Moe
This map shows the geographic impact of Roger E. Moe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger E. Moe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger E. Moe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roger E. Moe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger E. Moe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger E. Moe. The network helps show where Roger E. Moe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roger E. Moe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 406 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 228 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 211 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 170 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 144 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 124 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 92 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 87 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 83 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 79 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 74 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 67 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 65 | |
| 14 | 1963 | 62 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 59 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 54 | |
| 17 | 1964 | 41 | |
| 18 | NCCN Breast Cancer Practice Guidelines. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network. | 1996 | 41 |
| 19 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 26 |
About Roger E. Moe
Roger E. Moe is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Surgery and Dermatology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (23 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (17 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (8 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (4 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.4k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.0k citations), Oncology (1.1k citations), Dermatology (199 citations) and Surgery (611 citations). Roger E. Moe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin O. Anderson, Christopher I. Li, Janet R. Daling, David R. Byrd, Raymond S. Yeung, David A. Mankoff, Mary Austin-Seymour, Robert B. Livingston, DeAnn Lazovich and Cam Solomon. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, The American Journal of Surgery, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Radiology and Journal of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.