Roger Duke

1.1k total citations
40 papers, 546 citations indexed

About

Roger Duke is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Software and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Roger Duke has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 546 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 13 papers in Software and 12 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in Roger Duke's work include Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (10 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (10 papers) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (8 papers). Roger Duke is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (10 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (10 papers) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (8 papers). Roger Duke collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and India. Roger Duke's co-authors include Gordon A. Rose, Graeme Smith, Jin Song Dong, David Duke, Josiah Poon, Bertrand Meyer, Hao Peng, Paul Strooper, Alan Graham and Steven M. Butler and has published in prestigious journals such as Computer Standards & Interfaces, European Journal of Combinatorics and Evidence-Based Mental Health.

In The Last Decade

Roger Duke

39 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

Roger Duke
Stuart Faulk United States
Neil Goldman United States
Murali Sitaraman United States
Frank DeRemer United States
Joshua Sunshine United States
Roger Duke
Citations per year, relative to Roger Duke Roger Duke (= 1×) peers Thomas Arts

Countries citing papers authored by Roger Duke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Duke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Duke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Duke. The network helps show where Roger Duke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roger Duke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roger Duke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roger Duke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roger Duke. Roger Duke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Strooper, Paul, et al.. (2008). Exploring model-based development for the verification of real-time Java code. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 372. 71–81. 3 indexed citations
2.
Liang, Hui, Jin Song Dong, Jing Sun, Roger Duke, & R.E. Seviora. (2006). Formal specification-based online monitoring. 9–9. 2 indexed citations
3.
Hesse, Wolfgang, et al.. (2003). A software modelling exercise using FCA. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 213–226. 2 indexed citations
4.
Duke, Roger, et al.. (2003). A software design process to facilitate the teaching of mathematics. 1. 906–907. 2 indexed citations
6.
Butler, Steven M. & Roger Duke. (1998). Defining composition operators for object interaction.. 5. 1–16. 3 indexed citations
7.
Dong, Jin Song, Roger Duke, & Gordon A. Rose. (1997). An object-oriented denotational semantics of a small programming language.. 4. 29–52. 2 indexed citations
8.
Duke, Roger, et al.. (1997). Technology of object-oriented languages and systems 25. 17 indexed citations
9.
10.
Dong, Jin Song & Roger Duke. (1995). Exclusive Control within Object Oriented Systems. 6 indexed citations
11.
Rose, Gordon A., et al.. (1995). The role of secondary attributes in formal object modelling. 2. 31–38. 13 indexed citations
12.
Duke, Roger, Gordon A. Rose, & Graeme Smith. (1995). Object-Z: A specification language advocated for the description of standards. Computer Standards & Interfaces. 17(5-6). 511–533. 115 indexed citations
13.
Rose, Gordon A. & Roger Duke. (1994). An object-Z specification of a mobile phone system. 110–129. 4 indexed citations
14.
Dong, Jin Song & Roger Duke. (1994). The Geometry of Object Containment. 17 indexed citations
15.
Dong, Jin Song & Roger Duke. (1993). Class Union and Polymorphism.. Evidence-Based Mental Health. 17(1). 181–190. 12 indexed citations
16.
Champeaux, Dennis de, Pierre America, Derek Coleman, et al.. (1991). Formal Techniques for OO Software Development (Panel).. 166–170. 1 indexed citations
17.
Swatman, Paul A., Paula M. C. Swatman, & Roger Duke. (1991). Electronic Data Interchange a High-level Formal Specification in Object-Z. 341. 6 indexed citations
18.
Duke, Roger, et al.. (1991). The object-Z specification language: version 1. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 40 indexed citations
19.
Duke, David, et al.. (1989). Object-Z: An Object-Oriented Extension to Z. 281–296. 59 indexed citations
20.
Duke, Roger. (1987). Matroid Erection and Duality. European Journal of Combinatorics. 8(4). 367–370. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026