Roeland Geurts
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Biomedical Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering
- Co-authors
- M. V. MiloševıćF. M. PeetersJeroen SpoorenMieke QuaghebeurKris BroosKarl C. VranckenLiesbeth HorckmansPeter Nielsen
- Topics
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers)Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (3 papers)Iron-based superconductors research (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Condensed Matter PhysicsElectronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
Roeland Geurts
10 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Condensed Matter Physics 280
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 167
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 101
- Biomedical Engineering 75
- Mechanical Engineering 40
Countries citing papers authored by Roeland Geurts
This map shows the geographic impact of Roeland Geurts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roeland Geurts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roeland Geurts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roeland Geurts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roeland Geurts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roeland Geurts. The network helps show where Roeland Geurts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roeland Geurts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roeland Geurts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roeland Geurts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roeland Geurts. Roeland Geurts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 91 | |
| 6 | 73 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 56 |
About Roeland Geurts
Roeland Geurts is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (3 papers) and Iron-based superconductors research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (280 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (101 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (167 citations). Roeland Geurts has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include M. V. Miloševıć, F. M. Peeters, Jeroen Spooren, Mieke Quaghebeur, Kris Broos, Karl C. Vrancken, Liesbeth Horckmans, Peter Nielsen, J. Albino Aguiar and Matthieu Boone. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B and Journal of Cleaner Production.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.