Roel van Winsen

540 total citations
9 papers, 371 citations indexed

About

Roel van Winsen is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Roel van Winsen has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 371 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 5 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 3 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Roel van Winsen's work include Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (3 papers). Roel van Winsen is often cited by papers focused on Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (3 papers). Roel van Winsen collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Brazil and Australia. Roel van Winsen's co-authors include Éder Henriqson, Johan Bergström, Sidney Dekker, James M. Nyce, Nicklas Dahlström, Tarcísio Abreu Saurin, Margareta Lützhöft, Jaap F. Hamming and Anja H. Brunsveld‐Reinders and has published in prestigious journals such as Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Safety Science and Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.

In The Last Decade

Roel van Winsen

8 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Roel van Winsen Sweden	8	167	119	116	67	57	9	371
Éder Henriqson Brazil	10	212 1.3×	147 1.2×	85 0.7×	82 1.2×	59 1.0×	33	418
Pedro Ferreira Portugal	6	180 1.1×	150 1.3×	56 0.5×	30 0.4×	41 0.7×	12	315
Yushi Fujita Japan	10	140 0.8×	154 1.3×	114 1.0×	19 0.3×	28 0.5×	29	354
Geoffrey W. McCarthy Ireland	8	266 1.6×	209 1.8×	109 0.9×	31 0.5×	22 0.4×	11	471
Lia Buarque de Macedo Guimarães Brazil	10	230 1.4×	121 1.0×	79 0.7×	85 1.3×	27 0.5×	43	472
Angela Weber Righi Brazil	7	246 1.5×	165 1.4×	32 0.3×	105 1.6×	111 1.9×	14	495
Ivonne Herrera Norway	10	406 2.4×	340 2.9×	60 0.5×	98 1.5×	42 0.7×	18	549
Benjamin Brooks Australia	14	115 0.7×	81 0.7×	137 1.2×	45 0.7×	11 0.2×	44	532
M. Crichton United Kingdom	9	136 0.8×	118 1.0×	96 0.8×	20 0.3×	20 0.4×	16	299
Pia Oedewald Finland	11	298 1.8×	216 1.8×	53 0.5×	87 1.3×	13 0.2×	31	417

Countries citing papers authored by Roel van Winsen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roel van Winsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roel van Winsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roel van Winsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roel van Winsen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roel van Winsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roel van Winsen. The network helps show where Roel van Winsen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roel van Winsen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roel van Winsen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roel van Winsen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roel van Winsen. Roel van Winsen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Winsen, Roel van, et al.. (2024). Hospital ward incidents through the eyes of nurses – A thick description on the appeal and deadlock of incident reporting systems. Safety Science. 184. 106728–106728.

Bergström, Johan, Roel van Winsen, & Éder Henriqson. (2015). On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: A literature review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 141. 131–141. 176 indexed citations

Winsen, Roel van & Sidney Dekker. (2015). SA Anno 1995. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 9(1). 51–54. 11 indexed citations

Henriqson, Éder, et al.. (2014). The constitution and effects of safety culture as an object in the discourse of accident prevention: A Foucauldian approach. Safety Science. 70. 465–476. 29 indexed citations

Winsen, Roel van, et al.. (2014). Situation awareness: some conditions of possibility. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 16(1). 53–68. 10 indexed citations

Dekker, Sidney, James M. Nyce, Roel van Winsen, & Éder Henriqson. (2010). Epistemological Self-Confidence in Human Factors Research. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 4(1). 27–38. 23 indexed citations

Henriqson, Éder, Roel van Winsen, Tarcísio Abreu Saurin, & Sidney Dekker. (2010). How a cockpit calculates its speeds and why errors while doing this are so hard to detect. Cognition Technology & Work. 13(4). 217–231. 17 indexed citations

Bergström, Johan, et al.. (2009). Rule - and role-retreat: an empirical study of procedures and resilience. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 16 indexed citations

Dahlström, Nicklas, et al.. (2008). Fidelity and validity of simulator training. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 10(4). 305–314. 89 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact