Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Developmental Foreign Accent Syndrome: Report of a New Case
2016332 citationsStefanie Keulen, Roel Jonkers et al.Frontiers in Human Neuroscienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Roel Jonkers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roel Jonkers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roel Jonkers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roel Jonkers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roel Jonkers. The network helps show where Roel Jonkers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roel Jonkers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roel Jonkers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roel Jonkers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roel Jonkers. Roel Jonkers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Keulen, Stefanie, et al.. (2016). Psychogenic Foreign Accent Syndrome. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 10(143). 1–13.33 indexed citations
12.
Jonkers, Roel, et al.. (2011). Benoemen van acties door Alzheimerpatiënten: Effect van instrumentaliteit en naamsverwantschap. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 17(2). 3–18.2 indexed citations
Jonkers, Roel. (2005). Het werkwoordgebruik in de spontane taal van Nederlandstalige afasiepatiënten. 2(3).2 indexed citations
15.
Jonkers, Roel, et al.. (2005). Functionele of stoornisgerichte therapie: keus of geen keus. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 13(3). 173–178.
16.
Bastiaanse, Roelien, Roel Jonkers, Esther Ruigendijk, & Ron van Zonneveld. (2003). Gender and Case in Agrammatic Production. Cortex. 39(3). 405–417.13 indexed citations
17.
Jonkers, Roel & Roelien Bastiaanse. (1997). Verb retrieval in isolation and sentence context in Broca's aphasics : The effect of transitivity. Brain and Language. 60(1). 33–36.14 indexed citations
18.
Jonkers, Roel & Roelien Bastiaanse. (1996). The influence of instrumentalitry and transitivity on action naming in Broca's and anomic aphasia. Brain and Language. 55(1). 37–39.53 indexed citations
19.
Bastiaanse, Roelien, et al.. (1996). Aspects of lexical verbs in the spontaneous speech of agrammatic and anomic patients. Language and Cognition. 5. 13–26.10 indexed citations
20.
Jonkers, Roel. (1995). De invloed van het werkwoord op het taalgedrag van afasiepatiënten. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.