Rod Gow

63 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Rod Gow
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 362
  • Mathematical Physics 235
  • Geometry and Topology 223
  • Algebra and Number Theory 96
  • Artificial Intelligence 246
Replace Jonathan I. Hall with:
Jonathan I. Hall United States
R. H. Dye United Kingdom
Eva Bayer‐Fluckiger Switzerland
Mei-Chu Chang United States
Javier Cilleruelo Spain
Clark T. Benson United States
Jason Fulman United States
Antonio Pasini Italy
José Felipe Voloch United States
Rainer Löwen Germany
Rod Gow relative to Jonathan I. Hall United States Jonathan I. Hall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jonathan I. Hall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rod Gow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rod Gow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rod Gow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rod Gow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rod Gow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rod Gow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rod Gow. The network helps show where Rod Gow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Rod Gow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rod Gow Line = papers co-authored together Rod Gow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200034
2 197533
3 198129
4 197628
5 198924
6 198323
7 198521
8 200919
9 200819
10 198119
11 198818
12 197917
13 200917
14 200816
15 198915
16 198413
17 198012
18 197511
19 201010
20 198310

About Rod Gow

Rod Gow is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Artificial Intelligence, Geometry and Topology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Mathematical Physics, having authored 67 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Finite Group Theory Research (40 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (24 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (20 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (17 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (12 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (9 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (6 papers) and Cellular Automata and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (362 citations), Mathematical Physics (235 citations), Geometry and Topology (223 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (96 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (246 citations). Rod Gow has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Konstantinos Drakakis, Wolfgang M. Willems, Thomas J. Laffey, Liam O’Carroll, Gary McGuire, Scott Rickard, Jean‐Guillaume Dumas, J. F. Humphreys, Michel Lavrauw and John J. Healy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Journal of Number Theory and Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact