Rocío Gómez‐Molinero
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rocío Guil BozalAntonio Zayas GarcíaJosé Miguel Mestre NavasPaloma Gil-Olarte MárquezJavier J. González-RosaConstantino Méndez‐BértoloFernando López-SosaJaime Gómez‐Ramírez
- Topics
- Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers)Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers)Emotional Intelligence and Performance (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthFrontiers in Psychology
In The Last Decade
Rocío Gómez‐Molinero
17 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Clinical Psychology 160
- Social Psychology 106
- General Health Professions 51
- Sociology and Political Science 51
- Applied Psychology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Rocío Gómez‐Molinero
This map shows the geographic impact of Rocío Gómez‐Molinero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rocío Gómez‐Molinero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rocío Gómez‐Molinero more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rocío Gómez‐Molinero
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rocío Gómez‐Molinero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rocío Gómez‐Molinero. The network helps show where Rocío Gómez‐Molinero may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rocío Gómez‐Molinero
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rocío Gómez‐Molinero. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rocío Gómez‐Molinero based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rocío Gómez‐Molinero. Rocío Gómez‐Molinero is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 105 |
About Rocío Gómez‐Molinero
Rocío Gómez‐Molinero is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers) and Emotional Intelligence and Performance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (49 citations), Clinical Psychology (160 citations) and Social Psychology (106 citations). Rocío Gómez‐Molinero has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Chile and France. Frequent co-authors include Rocío Guil Bozal, Antonio Zayas García, José Miguel Mestre Navas, Paloma Gil-Olarte Márquez, Javier J. González-Rosa, Constantino Méndez‐Bértolo, Fernando López-Sosa, Jaime Gómez‐Ramírez and Álvaro Javier Cruz-Gómez. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.