Robert W. Sites

130 papers receiving 758 citations

Peers

Robert W. Sites
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 490
  • Insect Science 294
  • Ecological Modeling 63
  • Ecology 369
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 146
Replace Augusto Vigna Taglianti with:
Augusto Vigna Taglianti Italy
Milton de Souza Mendonça Brazil
B. Aukema Netherlands
John D. Lattin United States
Tom Gittings Ireland
Paul Hanson Costa Rica
Iain S. Downie United Kingdom
Tomasz Rewicz Poland
Jan Šìpoš Czechia
Richard Southwood
Robert W. Sites relative to Augusto Vigna Taglianti Italy Augusto Vigna Taglianti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Augusto Vigna Taglianti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Sites

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Sites's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Sites with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Sites more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Sites

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Sites. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Sites. The network helps show where Robert W. Sites may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert W. Sites, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert W. Sites Line = papers co-authored together Robert W. Sites links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 136 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200476
2 198242
3 199335
4 199130
5 200323
6 200717
7 200717
8 199117
9 199416
10 200016
11 202115
12 200215
13 200714
14 202114
15 201113
16 199013
17 199212
18 200311
19 200710
20
Lentic beetles of the Missouri Prairie Region: Habitat and regional associations, with keys to the hydradephaga
200310

About Robert W. Sites

Robert W. Sites is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Ecology, Genetics and Paleontology, having authored 136 papers that have together received 821 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemiptera Insect Studies (78 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (60 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (31 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (29 papers), Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (21 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (18 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (12 papers) and Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (490 citations), Insect Science (294 citations), Ecological Modeling (63 citations), Ecology (369 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (146 citations). Robert W. Sites has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Willig, J. E. McPherson, John T. Polhemus, Ernest B. Fish, Daryl Moorhead, Noah K. Whiteman, M. J. Linit, Michael L. Ferro, Rodolfo Novelo‐Gutiérrez and Allen Sanborn. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Environmental Entomology, Journal of Economic Entomology and Biotropica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact