Robert W. Frederick

2.0k citations
20 papers · 445 indexed · h-index 11

Robert W. Frederick

19 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Robert W. Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 104
  • Surgery 311
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 41
  • Rheumatology 77
  • Urology 24
Replace A. E. Hardy with:
A. E. Hardy New Zealand
Mikael Bitsch Denmark
Mark Perlman United States
M Mahran Egypt
Corné van Loon Netherlands
Jim K. Lai United States
Richard Ma United States
Jennifer Kruger New Zealand
Dan V. Poenaru Romania
Yair Barzilay Israel
Robert W. Frederick relative to A. E. Hardy New Zealand A. E. Hardy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
A. E. Hardy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Frederick. The network helps show where Robert W. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert W. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert W. Frederick Line = papers co-authored together Robert W. Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20219
2 20165
3 201415
4 201255
5 20126
6 200525
7 200473
8 200420
9 200416
10 20041
11 200342
12
Management of a 37-Year-Old Man with Recurrent Knee Pain
19999
13 199819
14 199892
15 199634
16 19895
17 198116
18
Presidents--Trustees and the Comprehensive Two-Year College.
19730
19
Student activities in American education
19652
20
The third curriculum : student activities in American education
19591

About Robert W. Frederick

Robert W. Frederick is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rheumatology, Surgery, Immunology and Allergy and Rehabilitation, having authored 20 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (3 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers), Hernia repair and management (3 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (2 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers) and Foot and Ankle Surgery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (104 citations), Surgery (311 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (41 citations), Rheumatology (77 citations) and Urology (24 citations). Robert W. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ashok S. Reddy, Gary E. Leach, Thomas Reilly, Erin T. Bird, Patrick S. Lowry, Christopher C. Dodson, Mitchell K. Freedman, Michael G. Ciccotti, Steven A. Cohen and Matthew J. Kraeutler. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, The Physician and Sportsmedicine, The Journal of Urology, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Journal of Asthma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026