Robert W. Deisher
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- James A. FarrowGary RemafediPeter A. FehrenbachDavid M. PapernySusan J. StandfastVíctor EisnerStephen SulzbacherWilliam M. Rogers
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Health (9 papers)Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers)Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert W. Deisher
39 papers receiving 936 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Clinical Psychology 649
- Sociology and Political Science 371
- General Health Professions 341
- Social Psychology 320
- Gender Studies 162
Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Deisher
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Deisher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Deisher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Deisher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Deisher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Deisher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Deisher. The network helps show where Robert W. Deisher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert W. Deisher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert W. Deisher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert W. Deisher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert W. Deisher. Robert W. Deisher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 337 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 299 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | Contemporary communal child rearing. A first analysis. | 8 |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | MOTHERS' OPINIONS OF THEIR PEDIATRIC CARE. | 49 |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Robert W. Deisher
Robert W. Deisher is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Health (9 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (649 citations), Gender Studies (162 citations) and Social Psychology (320 citations). Robert W. Deisher has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James A. Farrow, Gary Remafedi, Peter A. Fehrenbach, David M. Paperny, Susan J. Standfast, Víctor Eisner, Stephen Sulzbacher, William M. Rogers, Debra Boyer and C. A. Mills. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, American Journal of Public Health and The Journal of Pediatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.