Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?
2016528 citationsRobert van der Have, Luis RubalcabaResearch Policyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert van der Have
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert van der Have's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert van der Have with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert van der Have more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert van der Have
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert van der Have. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert van der Have. The network helps show where Robert van der Have may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert van der Have
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert van der Have.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert van der Have based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert van der Have. Robert van der Have is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Deschryvere, Matthias, et al.. (2018). Immigrants in the Innovation Economy – Lessons from Austria, Canada, Denmark and the Netherlands.3 indexed citations
3.
Have, Robert van der & Luis Rubalcaba. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?. Research Policy. 45(9). 1923–1935.528 indexed citations breakdown →
Deschryvere, Matthias, et al.. (2013). Roles, effectiveness, and impact of VTT: towards broad-based impact monitoring of a research and technology organisation. University of Twente Research Information.2 indexed citations
Have, Robert van der, et al.. (2012). Funder, activator, networker, investor...: Exploring roles of Tekes in fuelling Finnish innovation.4 indexed citations
9.
Smedlund, Anssi, et al.. (2011). Knowledge Transfer in Service Business Development - Transfer mechanisms and intermediaries in Finland.2 indexed citations
10.
Patel, Pankaj C. & Robert van der Have. (2010). ENHANCING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE THROUGH EXPLOITING COMPLEMENTARITY IN SEARCH BREADTH AND DEPTH. SSRN Electronic Journal. 30(9). 1.7 indexed citations
11.
Halonen, Minna, et al.. (2009). Suomalaisten innovaatioiden maantiede.2 indexed citations
Have, Robert van der, Marja Toivonen, & Tiina Tuominen. (2007). Dimensions of Service Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 732–736.
14.
Have, Robert van der & Marja Toivonen. (2007). The Applicability of Schumpeter's Innovation 'Cases' in the Classificationof Service Innovations. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.