Robert Stokes

45 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Robert Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Biophysics 30
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
  • Sociology and Political Science 180
  • Toxicology 12
  • Health 28
Replace Rong Hu with:
Rong Hu China
Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson United Kingdom
Joe Alper United States
Jonathan Parry United Kingdom
Mike Fortun United States
Martin Fritz Germany
Matthew Anderson United States
James Walter Australia
Hongliang Chen China
Boris Hofmann Switzerland
Robert Stokes relative to Rong Hu China Rong Hu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rong Hu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stokes. The network helps show where Robert Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000106
2 201071
3 201268
4 202031
5 200126
6 200526
7 196724
8 200922
9 200921
10 200818
11 200218
12 201215
13 200814
14 200914
15 20199
16
That sinking feeling : a legal assessment of the coastal planning system in New South Wales
20118
17 20198
18 20118
19 20057
20
Up the creek: what is wrong with the definition of a river in New South Wales?
20056

About Robert Stokes

Robert Stokes is a scholar working on Biophysics, Toxicology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Analytical Chemistry and Anthropology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (4 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (3 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (30 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations), Sociology and Political Science (180 citations), Toxicology (12 citations) and Health (28 citations). Robert Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Wayne N. Welsh, Jack R. Greene, Duncan Graham, Mark Patrick Taylor, George L. Maddox, Judith M. Curran, Raymond G. Sanedrin, Nabil A. Amro, John A. Hunt and H Jamil. Their work appears in journals such as Security Journal, Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vaccine and Australian Geographer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026