Countries citing papers authored by Robert Spaemann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Spaemann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Spaemann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Spaemann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Spaemann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Spaemann. The network helps show where Robert Spaemann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Spaemann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Spaemann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Spaemann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Spaemann. Robert Spaemann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Spaemann, Robert. (2012). Cos’è il naturale. OpenEdition (OpenEdition).1 indexed citations
2.
Spaemann, Robert. (2011). Nach uns die Kernschmelze : Hybris im atomaren Zeitalter. Klett-Cotta eBooks.1 indexed citations
3.
Spaemann, Robert. (2008). Rousseau, Mensch oder Bürger : das Dilemma der Moderne. Klett-Cotta eBooks.2 indexed citations
4.
Spaemann, Robert, et al.. (2007). Der letzte Gottesbeweis.3 indexed citations
5.
Spaemann, Robert. (2007). ¿Matar, o dejar morir?. Cuadernos de bioética. 18(1). 107–116.4 indexed citations
6.
Spaemann, Robert. (2002). Grenzen : zur ethischen Dimension des Handelns. Klett-Cotta eBooks.10 indexed citations
7.
Thomas, Aquinas, et al.. (2001). Über Sittliches Handeln : Summa theologiae I-II q. 18-21 : Lateinisch/Deutsch.1 indexed citations
Luhmann, Niklas & Robert Spaemann. (1991). Paradigm lost : über die ethische Reflexion der Moral : Rede von Niklas Luhmann anläßlich der Verleihung des Hegel-Preises 1989 . Niklas Luhmanns Herausforderung der Philosophie : Laudatio. Suhrkamp eBooks.2 indexed citations
10.
Luhmann, Niklas & Robert Spaemann. (1990). Paradigm lost : über die ethische Reflexion der Moral : Rede . Niklas Luhmanns Herausforderung der Philosophie : Laudatio. Suhrkamp eBooks.13 indexed citations
Koslowski, Peter & Robert Spaemann. (1986). Gesellschaft und Staat : ein unvermeidlicher Dualismus. Klett-Cotta eBooks.2 indexed citations
13.
Spaemann, Robert. (1986). Über den Begriff der Menschenwürde.7 indexed citations
14.
Spaemann, Robert, et al.. (1985). Die Frage wozu? : Geschichte und Wiederentdeckung des teleologischen Denkens. Piper eBooks.21 indexed citations
15.
Spaemann, Robert, et al.. (1984). Evolutionstheorie Und Menschliches Selbstverständnis Zur Philosophischen Kritik Eines Paradigmas Moderner Wissenschaft.
16.
Spaemann, Robert. (1983). Nochmals: deontologische oder teleologische Moralbegründung?: Eine Replik. 37(2). 79–84.1 indexed citations
17.
Spaemann, Robert. (1977). Zur Kritik der politischen Utopie : Zehn Kapitel politischer Philosophie.4 indexed citations
18.
Spaemann, Robert. (1972). Die Utopie der Herrschaftsfreiheit. Merkur. 26(8). 735–752.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.