Robert Rosebrugh

54 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Robert Rosebrugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Mathematical Physics 151
  • Geometry and Topology 140
  • Algebra and Number Theory 73
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 165
  • Theoretical Computer Science 9
Replace Éric Goubault with:
Éric Goubault France
Lev D. Beklemishev Russia
Jeffry L. Hirst United States
Nicolai Vorobjov United Kingdom
George Havas Australia
Michel Schellekens Ireland
Nigel Boston United States
Anant P. Godbole United States
Omer Giménez Spain
Adam Grabowski Poland
Robert Rosebrugh relative to Éric Goubault France Éric Goubault's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Éric Goubault · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Rosebrugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Rosebrugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Rosebrugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Rosebrugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Rosebrugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Rosebrugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Rosebrugh. The network helps show where Robert Rosebrugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Robert Rosebrugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Rosebrugh Line = papers co-authored together Robert Rosebrugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200365
2 197838
3 199424
4 200222
5 201118
6 200217
7 200216
8 200516
9 200715
10 197913
11 200112
12
Unifying Set-Based, Delta-Based and Edit-Based Lenses
201612
13 199110
14 201310
15
Spans of lenses
20149
16 19929
17 20179
18 20028
19 19848
20 20128

About Robert Rosebrugh

Robert Rosebrugh is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 55 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (14 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (11 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (11 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (10 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (8 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (8 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (7 papers) and semigroups and automata theory (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (151 citations), Geometry and Topology (140 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (73 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (165 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations). Robert Rosebrugh has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Wood, Michael Johnson, F. William Lawvere, Robert Paré, R. F. C. Walters, N. Sabadini, R. S. Rodger, Peter Johnstone, Derick Wood and C. N. G. Dampney. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Theory and applications of categories, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, Applied Categorical Structures and Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact