Robert Rauschenberger
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Co-authors
- Steven YantisErin L. AustenVincent Di LolloJames T. EnnsXianjun Sam ZhengJames Jeng-Weei LinThomas A. CarlsonFrans A.J. Verstraten
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers)Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers)
- Journals
- NaturePsychological ScienceJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Robert Rauschenberger
25 papers receiving 610 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cognitive Neuroscience 488
- Social Psychology 132
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 130
- Human-Computer Interaction 52
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Rauschenberger
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Rauschenberger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Rauschenberger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Rauschenberger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Rauschenberger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Rauschenberger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Rauschenberger. The network helps show where Robert Rauschenberger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Rauschenberger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Rauschenberger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Rauschenberger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Rauschenberger. Robert Rauschenberger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 75 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 74 | |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 83 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Robert Rauschenberger
Robert Rauschenberger is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Human-Computer Interaction and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 25 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (488 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (52 citations). Robert Rauschenberger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Steven Yantis, Erin L. Austen, Vincent Di Lollo, James T. Enns, Xianjun Sam Zheng, James Jeng-Weei Lin, Thomas A. Carlson, Frans A.J. Verstraten, Mary A. Peterson and Scott D. Slotnick. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Psychological Science and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.