Robert Porter

1.6k citations
33 papers · 203 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Porter

27 papers receiving 186 citations

Peers

Robert Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 101
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 9
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 32
  • Signal Processing 18
Replace Susan B. Levin with:
Susan B. Levin United States
Wade Junek Canada
Valerie N. Stratton United States
Sara Waller United States
Robert Eklund Sweden
H. T. Edwards United States
Jocelynne Watson United Kingdom
Patrick Abitbol France
Favio Shifres Argentina
Mel Greenlee United States
Robert Porter relative to Susan B. Levin United States Susan B. Levin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Susan B. Levin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Porter. The network helps show where Robert Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Porter Line = papers co-authored together Robert Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197560
2 200024
3 202213
4 199112
5 199110
6 20169
7 20159
8 19788
9 20227
10 19865
11 19755
12 20195
13 19715
14 19794
15 19774
16 19743
17 20232
18 19832
19 19882
20 19832

About Robert Porter

Robert Porter is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Sociology and Political Science and Genetics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 203 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (8 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (2 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (72 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (101 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (9 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (32 citations) and Signal Processing (18 citations). Robert Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael F. Dorman, David E. Vance, Susan Shaiman, John K. Cullen, Charles I. Berlín, Thomas Lücke, Austin Edwards, Charles D. Mitchell, Larry F. Hughes and William Hunt. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, The Slavic and East European Journal, Cortex and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact