Robert Planqué

2.8k citations
34 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 17

Robert Planqué

31 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Robert Planqué
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Developmental Biology 224
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 554
  • Genetics 331
  • Insect Science 141
  • Ecology 215
Replace T. M. Schaerf with:
T. M. Schaerf Australia
Daniel I. Rubenstein United States
Travis C. Collier United States
Thomas M. Houslay United Kingdom
Patsy Haccou Netherlands
William E. Conner United States
William L. Romey United States
Colette Rivault France
Amiyaal Ilany Israel
Octavio Miramontes Mexico
Robert Planqué relative to T. M. Schaerf Australia T. M. Schaerf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
T. M. Schaerf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Planqué

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Planqué's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Planqué with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Planqué more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Planqué

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Planqué. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Planqué. The network helps show where Robert Planqué may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Planqué, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Planqué Line = papers co-authored together Robert Planqué links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20250
4 20234
5
Overview of BirdCLEF 2021: Bird call identification in soundscape recordings.
202110
6 202018
7 201926
8 201948
9 20196
10 201811
11 20187
12
The Xeno-canto Collection and its Relation to Sound Recognition and Classification.
201530
13 20131
14 201324
15 20104
16 201041
17 2009171
18 200711
19 200758
20 200228

About Robert Planqué

Robert Planqué is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics and Signal Processing, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (10 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (6 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (224 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (554 citations), Genetics (331 citations), Insect Science (141 citations) and Ecology (215 citations). Robert Planqué has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nigel R. Franks, Bas Teusink, Frank J. Bruggeman, Hans Slabbekoorn, N. F. Britton, Tim Kovacs, James A. R. Marshall, Anna Dornhaus, Josephus Hulshof and Rafał Bogacz. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Computational Biology, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Biosciences and Journal of Mathematical Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026