Robert Peter Ebert

617 total citations
12 papers, 254 citations indexed

About

Robert Peter Ebert is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Peter Ebert has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 254 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Language and Linguistics, 2 papers in Linguistics and Language and 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Robert Peter Ebert's work include Linguistic research and analysis (8 papers), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (5 papers) and Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (4 papers). Robert Peter Ebert is often cited by papers focused on Linguistic research and analysis (8 papers), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (5 papers) and Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (4 papers). Robert Peter Ebert collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert Peter Ebert's co-authors include Frederick J. Newmeyer, Andrew Radford, D. J. Brink and Neil Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Modern Language Journal, German Studies Review and Studies in Language.

In The Last Decade

Robert Peter Ebert

12 papers receiving 182 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert Peter Ebert United States	7	194	81	63	46	35	12	254
Peter C. Bjarkman United States	5	130 0.7×	48 0.6×	49 0.8×	70 1.5×	20 0.6×	15	179
Janet H. Randall Mexico	6	204 1.1×	91 1.1×	56 0.9×	65 1.4×	48 1.4×	11	245
Gerhard Helbig	8	279 1.4×	97 1.2×	41 0.7×	53 1.2×	21 0.6×	55	333
Andrew Carstairs New Zealand	9	178 0.9×	47 0.6×	64 1.0×	68 1.5×	21 0.6×	13	220
Ray Cattell	5	138 0.7×	60 0.7×	44 0.7×	40 0.9×	13 0.4×	6	162
Marta Luján United States	6	186 1.0×	44 0.5×	58 0.9×	56 1.2×	38 1.1×	15	203
R. M. W. Dixon United Kingdom	2	259 1.3×	64 0.8×	105 1.7×	74 1.6×	24 0.7×	3	295
Paolo Ramat Italy	12	285 1.5×	68 0.8×	140 2.2×	90 2.0×	14 0.4×	45	348
Donna B. Gerdts Canada	9	269 1.4×	87 1.1×	119 1.9×	82 1.8×	33 0.9×	36	302
Fe T. Otanes	3	260 1.3×	78 1.0×	165 2.6×	88 1.9×	23 0.7×	4	320

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Peter Ebert

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Peter Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Peter Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Peter Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Peter Ebert

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Peter Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Peter Ebert. The network helps show where Robert Peter Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Peter Ebert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Peter Ebert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Peter Ebert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Peter Ebert. Robert Peter Ebert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Ebert, Robert Peter. (2003). Die Stellung des attributiven Genitivs in Luthers Schriften. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 28(2). 195–229. 1 indexed citations

2.

Ebert, Robert Peter. (1999). Historische Syntax des Deutschen II : 1300-1750. 9 indexed citations

3.

Ebert, Robert Peter. (1998). Verbstellungswandel bei Jugendlichen, Frauen und Männern im 16. Jahrhundert. 1 indexed citations

4.

Ebert, Robert Peter. (1990). Review of Weerman (1989): The V2 conspiracy. A synchronic and a diachronic analysis of verbal positions in Germanic languages. Studies in Language. 14(2). 490–498. 1 indexed citations

5.

Ebert, Robert Peter & Frederick J. Newmeyer. (1984). Grammatical Theory. Its Limits and Its Possibilities. Modern Language Journal. 68(3). 298–298. 120 indexed citations

6.

Ebert, Robert Peter & Andrew Radford. (1983). Transformational Syntax. A Student's Guide to Chomsky's Extended Standard Theory. Modern Language Journal. 67(1). 87–87. 62 indexed citations

7.

Ebert, Robert Peter, et al.. (1981). Modern Linguistics: The Results of Chomsky's Revolution. Modern Language Journal. 65(4). 420–420. 1 indexed citations

8.

Ebert, Robert Peter. (1981). SOCIAL AND STYLISTIC VARIATION IN THE ORDER OF AUXILIARY AND NONFINITE VERB IN DEPENDENT CLAUSES IN EARLY NEW HIGH GERMAN. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB). 1981(103). 6 indexed citations

9.

Ebert, Robert Peter. (1980). SOCIAL AND STYLISTIC VARIATION IN EARLY NEW HIGH GERMAN WORD ORDER: THE SENTENCE FRAME (›SATZRAHMEN‹). Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB). 1980(102). 7 indexed citations

10.

Brink, D. J. & Robert Peter Ebert. (1979). Historische Syntax des Deutschen. German Studies Review. 2(2). 230–230. 9 indexed citations

11.

Ebert, Robert Peter. (1978). Historische Syntax des Deutschen. J.B. Metzler eBooks. 26 indexed citations

12.

Ebert, Robert Peter. (1976). Infinitival complement constructions in Early New High German. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact