Robert Pedicini

10 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Robert Pedicini
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Emergency Medicine 171
  • Biomedical Engineering 253
  • Surgery 225
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 101
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 46
Replace Catalina Breton with:
Catalina Breton United States
Andrew Mullin United States
Lara Reyelt United States
Nanna Louise Junker Udesen Denmark
Akif Ündar United States
Susan McRee United States
Abdulfattah Saidi United States
Jelena Köster Germany
Ettore Vitali Italy
Leonhard Binzenhöfer Germany
Robert Pedicini relative to Catalina Breton United States Catalina Breton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Catalina Breton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Pedicini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Pedicini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Pedicini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Pedicini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Pedicini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Pedicini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Pedicini. The network helps show where Robert Pedicini may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Pedicini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Pedicini Line = papers co-authored together Robert Pedicini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2018117
2 201766
3 201841
4 201734
5 201929
6 201714
7 20182
8 20182
9 20181
10 20161

About Robert Pedicini

Robert Pedicini is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (9 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (7 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (7 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (1 paper) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (171 citations), Biomedical Engineering (253 citations), Surgery (225 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (101 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (46 citations). Robert Pedicini has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Navin K. Kapur, Michele Esposito, Catalina Breton, Andrew Mullin, Shiva Annamalai, Kevin Morine, Richard H. Karas, Vikram Paruchuri, Ayan R. Patel and Xiaoying Qiao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Journal of the American Heart Association, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Artificial Organs and Journal of Cardiac Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact