Artificial Organs

5.9k papers and 86.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.9k papers published in Artificial Organs in the last decades have received a total of 86.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Artificial Organs usually cover Biomedical Engineering (2.8k papers), Surgery (2.7k papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2.3k papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (1.0k papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (752 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Artificial Organs are Yukihiko Nosé, Akif Ündar, Setsuo Takatani, Thomas Ming Swi Chang, James F. Antaki, Keiichi Fukuda, Don B. Olsen, Paul S. Malchesky, Zhongjun J. Wu and Heinrich Schima.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Artificial Organs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Artificial Organs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Artificial Organs.

Countries where authors publish in Artificial Organs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Artificial Organs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Artificial Organs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Artificial Organs more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025