Róbert Maráz

22 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers

Róbert Maráz
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Cancer Research 208
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 180
  • Oncology 78
  • Surgery 110
  • Dermatology 18
Replace Amina Khan with:
Amina Khan Pakistan
Federica Chiesa Italy
Roswitha Köberle-Wührer Austria
Tammeza Gibson United States
H.A.G. van der Pol Netherlands
Takao Taniya Japan
Cihan Uras Türkiye
Grantley Gill Australia
Helen Mabry United States
P Bravetti Italy
Róbert Maráz relative to Amina Khan Pakistan Amina Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Amina Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Róbert Maráz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Róbert Maráz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Róbert Maráz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Róbert Maráz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Róbert Maráz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Róbert Maráz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Róbert Maráz. The network helps show where Róbert Maráz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Róbert Maráz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Róbert Maráz Line = papers co-authored together Róbert Maráz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200477
2 200950
3 201122
4 201916
5 201414
6 201312
7 20127
8 20107
9 20095
10 20134
11 20174
12
[3rd Hungarian Breast Cancer Consensus Conference - Surgery Guidelines].
20163
13 20193
14 20103
15
[Sentinel lymph node biopsy for in situ carcinoma of the breast. Experience at the Bács-Kiskun County Hospital and review of the literature].
20062
16
[Response rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast preserving treatment in patients with locally advanced breast cancer].
20052
17 20152
18 20212
19
[Modern surgical treatment of breast cancer. 4th Breast Cancer Consensus Conference].
20202
20 20212

About Róbert Maráz

Róbert Maráz is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Geography, Planning and Development, Dermatology and Surgery, having authored 23 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (17 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (12 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (8 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (3 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers), Male Breast Health Studies (2 papers) and Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (208 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (180 citations), Oncology (78 citations), Surgery (110 citations) and Dermatology (18 citations). Róbert Maráz has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Slovenia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Gábor Cserni, Gábor Boross, Mihály Svébis, Éva Ambrózay, Rita Bori, György Lázár, András Vörös, Pavel Fabián, Tomáš Pavlík and Oldřich Coufal. Their work appears in journals such as Pathology & Oncology Research, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, The American Surgeon, Breast Cancer and Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026