Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Oceanic Sink for Anthropogenic CO 2
20042.9k citationsChristopher L. Sabine, Richard A. Feely et al.Scienceprofile →
A global ocean carbon climatology: Results from Global Data Analysis Project (GLODAP)
20041.3k citationsRobert M. Key, Alex Kozyr et al.Global Biogeochemical Cyclesprofile →
The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO 2 from 1994 to 2007
2019545 citationsNicolas Gruber, Dominic Clement et al.Scienceprofile →
The Global Ocean Data Analysis Project version 2 (GLODAPv2) – an internallyconsistent data product for the world ocean
2016443 citationsAre Olsen, Robert M. Key et al.Earth system science dataprofile →
A new global interior ocean mapped climatology: the 1° × 1° GLODAP version 2
2016317 citationsSiv K. Lauvset, Robert M. Key et al.Earth system science dataprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Key more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Key. The network helps show where Robert M. Key may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M. Key
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M. Key.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M. Key based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M. Key. Robert M. Key is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Haumann, F. Alexander, Stephen C. Riser, Lars H. Smedsrud, et al.. (2020). Supercooled Southern Ocean Waters. Geophysical Research Letters. 47(20).24 indexed citations
7.
Gruber, Nicolas, Dominic Clement, Brendan R. Carter, et al.. (2019). The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO 2 from 1994 to 2007. Science. 363(6432). 1193–1199.545 indexed citations breakdown →
Lauvset, Siv K., Robert M. Key, Are Olsen, et al.. (2016). A new global interior ocean mapped climatology: the 1° × 1° GLODAP version 2. Earth system science data. 8(2). 325–340.317 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Olsen, Are, Robert M. Key, Steven van Heuven, et al.. (2016). The Global Ocean Data Analysis Project version 2 (GLODAPv2) – an internallyconsistent data product for the world ocean. Earth system science data. 8(2). 297–323.443 indexed citations breakdown →
Key, Robert M., Alex Kozyr, C. Sabine, et al.. (2004). A global ocean carbon climatology: Results from Global Data Analysis Project (GLODAP). Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 18(4).1340 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Wanninkhof, Rik, Tianji Peng, Robert M. Key, et al.. (2004). An Updated Anthropogenic CO 2 Inventory in the Atlantic Ocean. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2004.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.