Robert M. Bird
Impact in
- Paleontology top 10%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Genetics top 10%
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Vascular Anomalies and Treatments
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 4
- Forestry 2
- Co-authors
- M. M. Goodman (2 shared papers)Yoshiro Mano (3 shared papers)Fumie Omori (3 shared papers)Tadashi Takamizo (2 shared papers)Bryan Kindiger (2 shared papers)William E. Jaques (2 shared papers)Richard A. Marshall (3 shared papers)James F. Hammarsten (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Antiquity (3 papers)Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2 papers)Nature (2 papers)Economic Botany (2 papers)Plant and Soil (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Robert M. Bird
38 papers receiving 608 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Paleontology 83
- Genetics 103
- Plant Science 322
- Geography, Planning and Development 46
- Hematology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Bird
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Bird more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Bird
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Bird. The network helps show where Robert M. Bird may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Bird, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 79 | |
| 2 | 1957 | 66 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 65 | |
| 5 | 1959 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 7 | A remarkable new teosinte from Nicaragua: growth and treatment of progeny. | 2000 | 30 |
| 8 | 1981 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1951 | 26 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 26 | |
| 11 | 1955 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1978 | 23 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 21 | |
| 14 | 1980 | 19 | |
| 15 | 1954 | 18 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1951 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 13 |
About Robert M. Bird
Robert M. Bird is a scholar working on Paleontology, Forestry, Hematology, Genetics and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 39 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (6 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (4 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (3 papers), Plant responses to water stress (3 papers), Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (2 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (2 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (2 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (83 citations), Genetics (103 citations), Plant Science (322 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (46 citations) and Hematology (62 citations). Robert M. Bird has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include M. M. Goodman, Yoshiro Mano, Fumie Omori, Tadashi Takamizo, Bryan Kindiger, William E. Jaques, Richard A. Marshall, James F. Hammarsten, Junius B. Bird and R. Consden. Their work appears in journals such as American Antiquity, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Nature, Economic Botany and Plant and Soil.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.