Robert Lynch

1.0k total citations
55 papers, 680 citations indexed

About

Robert Lynch is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Lynch has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 680 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 17 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 11 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Robert Lynch's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (17 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (10 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers). Robert Lynch is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (17 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (10 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers). Robert Lynch collaborates with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Finland. Robert Lynch's co-authors include Harry A. Mavromatis, Virpi Lummaa, Diane Hamilton, Jenni E. Pettay, Simon N. Chapman, Mary K. Shenk, Ryne A. Palombit, Anthony Di Fiore, Mirkka Lahdenperä and John Loehr and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Robert Lynch

53 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert Lynch United States 14 384 291 72 71 68 55 680
Maŕıa José Cantero Spain 14 137 0.4× 130 0.4× 38 0.5× 89 1.3× 40 0.6× 48 690
Arthur Zajonc United States 17 294 0.8× 166 0.6× 87 1.2× 23 0.3× 47 0.7× 34 1.0k
Louis Deslauriers United States 18 800 2.1× 649 2.2× 58 0.8× 45 0.6× 97 1.4× 27 2.7k
Ana Marı́a Cetto Mexico 18 712 1.9× 216 0.7× 35 0.5× 435 6.1× 28 0.4× 82 1.1k
Gary Felder United States 20 109 0.3× 38 0.1× 18 0.3× 175 2.5× 82 1.2× 28 2.7k
Sushovan De United States 7 65 0.2× 166 0.6× 212 2.9× 31 0.4× 56 0.8× 8 666
Kevin Young United States 20 535 1.4× 667 2.3× 49 0.7× 52 0.7× 31 0.5× 45 1.2k
C. A. Hooker Australia 15 54 0.1× 87 0.3× 102 1.4× 15 0.2× 138 2.0× 30 795
James T. Cushing United States 16 666 1.7× 174 0.6× 68 0.9× 203 2.9× 74 1.1× 74 1.2k
M. J. Levine United States 12 150 0.4× 18 0.1× 61 0.8× 31 0.4× 46 0.7× 15 782

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Lynch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Lynch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Lynch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Lynch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Lynch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Lynch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Lynch. The network helps show where Robert Lynch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Lynch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Lynch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Lynch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Lynch. Robert Lynch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schaffnit, Susan B., Abigail E. Page, Robert Lynch, et al.. (2024). Religious women receive more allomaternal support from non-partner kin in two low-fertility countries. Evolution and Human Behavior. 45(3). 268–280. 2 indexed citations
2.
Schaffnit, Susan B., Robert Lynch, Rebecca Sear, et al.. (2024). Cost structures and socioecological conditions impact the fitness outcomes of human alloparental care in agent-based model simulations. Evolution and Human Behavior. 45(5). 106613–106613.
3.
Schaffnit, Susan B., Abigail E. Page, Robert Lynch, et al.. (2022). The impact of market integration on arranged marriages in Matlab, Bangladesh. Evolutionary Human Sciences. 5. e5–e5. 5 indexed citations
4.
Lynch, Robert, Susan B. Schaffnit, Rebecca Sear, et al.. (2022). Religiosity is associated with greater size, kin density, and geographic dispersal of women’s social networks in Bangladesh. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 18780–18780. 10 indexed citations
5.
Shaver, John H., et al.. (2022). Faith and fertility in evolutionary perspective. Religion Brain & Behavior. 12(4). 417–425. 1 indexed citations
6.
Chapman, Simon N., Mirkka Lahdenperä, Jenni E. Pettay, Robert Lynch, & Virpi Lummaa. (2021). Offspring fertility and grandchild survival enhanced by maternal grandmothers in a pre-industrial human society. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 3652–3652. 27 indexed citations
7.
Lynch, Robert, Virpi Lummaa, Michael Briga, Simon N. Chapman, & John Loehr. (2020). Child volunteers in a women's paramilitary organization in World War II have accelerated reproductive schedules. Nature Communications. 11(1). 2377–2377. 8 indexed citations
8.
Lynch, Robert, et al.. (2018). Sexual conflict and the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: Females prefer daughters and males prefer sons. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 15463–15463. 9 indexed citations
9.
Lynch, Robert, et al.. (2017). The impact of parental investment on lifetime reproductive success in Iceland. PeerJ. 5. e2904–e2904. 4 indexed citations
10.
Lynch, Robert, Brian G. Palestis, & Robert Trivers. (2017). Religious Devotion and Extrinsic Religiosity Affect In-group Altruism and Out-group Hostility Oppositely in Rural Jamaica. Evolutionary Psychological Science. 3(4). 335–344. 6 indexed citations
11.
Lynch, Robert. (2016). Parents face quantity–quality trade-offs between reproduction and investment in offspring in Iceland. Royal Society Open Science. 3(5). 160087–160087. 14 indexed citations
12.
Lynch, Robert, et al.. (2001). Using the ETS Major Field Test in Business: Implications for Assessment. Journal of Education for Business. 77(1). 51–56. 39 indexed citations
13.
Lynch, Robert & Harry A. Mavromatis. (1995). Puri’s criterion and higher-order squeezing. Physical Review A. 52(1). 55–57. 11 indexed citations
14.
Lynch, Robert. (1993). Comparison of Vogel-Schleich phase theory with quantum phase measurements. Physical Review A. 47(2). 1576–1578. 4 indexed citations
15.
Lynch, Robert & Harry A. Mavromatis. (1993). Consideration of the general state which minimizes the Nth order minimum uncertainty product. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 34(2). 528–534. 5 indexed citations
16.
Lynch, Robert & Harry A. Mavromatis. (1990). N-dimensional harmonic oscillator yields monotonic series for the mathematical constant π. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 30(2). 127–137. 6 indexed citations
17.
Lynch, Robert. (1987). Phase fluctuations in a squeezed state using measured phase operators. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 4(10). 1723–1723. 30 indexed citations
18.
Lynch, Robert. (1985). Repeated Contractive-State Position Measurements and the Standard Quantum Limit. Physical Review Letters. 54(15). 1599–1601. 9 indexed citations
19.
Lynch, Robert. (1974). Comments on "Qualitative explanation of Pellam's helium paradox". Physical review. A, General physics. 10(4). 1435–1436. 1 indexed citations
20.
Lynch, Robert & John R. Pellam. (1973). Rayleigh Disk in dc Helium II Counterflow. Physical Review Letters. 31(1). 17–19. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026