Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Brazos River bar [Texas]; a study in the significance of grain size parameters
19575.8k citationsRobert L. Folk, W WardJournal of Sedimentary Researchprofile →
The Distinction between Grain Size and Mineral Composition in Sedimentary-Rock Nomenclature
19541.1k citationsRobert L. FolkThe Journal of Geologyprofile →
Practical Petrographic Classification of Limestones
1959871 citationsRobert L. FolkAAPG Bulletinprofile →
A REVIEW OF GRAIN‐SIZE PARAMETERS
1966682 citationsRobert L. FolkSedimentologyprofile →
Pebbles in the Lower Colorado River, Texas a Study in Particle Morphogenesis
1958641 citationsRobert L. Folk et al.The Journal of Geologyprofile →
Detrital sedimentary rock classification and nomenclature for use in New Zealand
1970631 citationsRobert L. Folk, Peter B. Andrews et al.New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysicsprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Folk
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Folk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Folk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Folk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Folk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Folk. The network helps show where Robert L. Folk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert L. Folk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert L. Folk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert L. Folk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert L. Folk. Robert L. Folk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Folk, Robert L.. (1997). Nannobacteria and the oxidation of iron on Earth (and perhaps Mars). Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America. 29(6). 129.
Fairchild, Thomas R., J. William Schopf, & Robert L. Folk. (1973). Filamentous algal microfossils form the Caballos Novaculite, Devonian of Texas. Journal of Paleontology. 47(5). 946–952.13 indexed citations
Folk, Robert L., Peter B. Andrews, & Douglas W. Lewis. (1970). Detrital sedimentary rock classification and nomenclature for use in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics. 13(4). 937–968.631 indexed citations breakdown →
Folk, Robert L.. (1959). Practical Petrographic Classification of Limestones. AAPG Bulletin. 43.871 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Folk, Robert L., et al.. (1958). Pebbles in the Lower Colorado River, Texas a Study in Particle Morphogenesis. The Journal of Geology. 66(2). 114–150.641 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Folk, Robert L. & W Ward. (1957). Brazos River bar [Texas]; a study in the significance of grain size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 27(1). 3–26.5788 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Folk, Robert L.. (1955). Note on the significance of “Turbid” feldspars. American Mineralogist. 40. 356–357.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.