Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of Life
Countries citing papers authored by J. William Schopf
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. William Schopf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. William Schopf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. William Schopf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. William Schopf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. William Schopf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. William Schopf. The network helps show where J. William Schopf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. William Schopf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. William Schopf.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. William Schopf based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. William Schopf. J. William Schopf is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schopf, J. William, et al.. (2010). Molecular Chemistry, Cellular Anatomy, Taphonomy and Mode of Preservation of Ancient Rock-embedded Microscopic Fossils. LPICo. 1538. 5288.1 indexed citations
6.
Czaja, Andrew D., Anatoliy B. Kudryavtsev, George D. Cody, & J. William Schopf. (2008). Similar fossil ferns having dissimilar organic geochemical preservation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Supplement. 72(12).
Schopf, J. William, Donald R. Lowe, J. M. Hayes, et al.. (1992). The Proterozoic Biosphere. Cambridge University Press eBooks.642 indexed citations breakdown →
Schopf, J. William, et al.. (1974). Microorganisms from the Kalkberg Limestone (lower Devonian) of New York State. Journal of Paleontology. 48(1). 74–77.10 indexed citations
16.
Schopf, J. William, et al.. (1973). On the development of metaphytes and metazoans. Journal of Paleontology. 47(1). 1–9.58 indexed citations
17.
Fairchild, Thomas R., J. William Schopf, & Robert L. Folk. (1973). Filamentous algal microfossils form the Caballos Novaculite, Devonian of Texas. Journal of Paleontology. 47(5). 946–952.13 indexed citations
18.
Schopf, J. William, Dorothy Z. Oehler, Robert J. Horodyski, & Keith A. Kvenvolden. (1971). Biogenicity and significance of the oldest known stromatolites. Journal of Paleontology. 45(3). 477–485.51 indexed citations
19.
Schopf, J. William, et al.. (1971). New microorganisms from the Bitter Springs Formation (late Precambrian) of the north-central Amadeus Basin, Australia. Journal of Paleontology. 45(6). 925–960.192 indexed citations
20.
Schopf, J. William & Elso S. Barghoorn. (1969). Microorganisms from the late Precambrian of South Australia. Journal of Paleontology. 43(1). 111–118.41 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.