Robert H. Spector
- Neurology top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Surgery
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Daniel L. BarrowGeorge T. TindallIra F. BraunSuzie C. TindallB. Todd TroostJanis T. EellsMassimo S. FiandacaYoshio Takei
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (9 papers)Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (4 papers)Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert H. Spector
25 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Neurology 940
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 181
- Epidemiology 166
- Surgery 117
- Ophthalmology 94
Countries citing papers authored by Robert H. Spector
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert H. Spector's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert H. Spector with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert H. Spector more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert H. Spector
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert H. Spector. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert H. Spector. The network helps show where Robert H. Spector may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert H. Spector
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert H. Spector. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert H. Spector based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert H. Spector. Robert H. Spector is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 72 | |
| 9 | Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulasbreakdown → | 790 |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | Deoxynucleoside and vitamin transport into the central nervous system. | 41 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease mimicking ocular myasthenia gravis. | 6 |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Robert H. Spector
Robert H. Spector is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (9 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (4 papers) and Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (940 citations), Ophthalmology (94 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (181 citations). Robert H. Spector has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel L. Barrow, George T. Tindall, Ira F. Braun, Suzie C. Tindall, B. Todd Troost, Janis T. Eells, Massimo S. Fiandaca, Yoshio Takei, Joel S. Glaser and Robert B. Daroff. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Annals of Neurology and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.