Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Donor leukocyte infusions in 140 patients with relapsed malignancy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
1997993 citationsRobert H. Collins, Ofer Shpilberg et al.Journal of Clinical Oncologyprofile →
OncogenicCSF3RMutations in Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia and Atypical CML
2013356 citationsDaniel A. Pollyea, Robert H. Collins et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert H. Collins
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert H. Collins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert H. Collins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert H. Collins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert H. Collins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert H. Collins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert H. Collins. The network helps show where Robert H. Collins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert H. Collins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert H. Collins.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert H. Collins based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert H. Collins. Robert H. Collins is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Collins, Robert H.. (2013). Portable Computers: Applications to Increase Salesforce Productivity. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management.7 indexed citations
10.
Collins, Robert H., et al.. (2013). Microcomputer Applications: Artificial Intelligence in Sales Forecasting Applications. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management.
Michálek, Jaroslav, Robert H. Collins, Brenna J. Hill, Ellen S. Vitetta, & Daniel C. Douek. (2001). The Emergence of Specific T Cell Clones During the Generationof GVHD. Blood.1 indexed citations
16.
Collins, Robert H., Ofer Shpilberg, William R. Drobyski, et al.. (1997). Donor leukocyte infusions in 140 patients with relapsed malignancy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 15(2). 433–444.993 indexed citations breakdown →
Haasler, George B., et al.. (1985). Two-dimensional echocardiography in dogs. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 90(3). 430–440.26 indexed citations
19.
Collins, Robert H., et al.. (1984). Strategic Formulation Consistent With PIMs: A Micro-Computer Application. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference. 11.1 indexed citations
20.
Collins, Robert H., et al.. (1984). Using Micro-Computers to Support the Analysis of Complex Cases: It’s as Easy As 1-2-3. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference. 11.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.