521 total citations 18 papers, 73 citations indexed
About
Robert Grosseteste is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics and History.
According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Grosseteste has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 73 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Philosophy, 2 papers in Classics and 2 papers in History. Recurrent topics in Robert Grosseteste's work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (3 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (2 papers). Robert Grosseteste is often cited by papers focused on Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (3 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (2 papers). Robert Grosseteste collaborates with scholars based in . Robert Grosseteste's co-authors include Pietro Rossi, Richard C. Dales, William Cunningham, Aristotle , V. J. Scattergood, Michael, E. Dobson and Herman Paul and has published in prestigious journals such as The Modern Language Review, Isis and Mediaeval Studies.
In The Last Decade
Robert Grosseteste
12 papers
receiving
43 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Grosseteste
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Grosseteste's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Grosseteste with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Grosseteste more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Grosseteste
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Grosseteste. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Grosseteste. The network helps show where Robert Grosseteste may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Grosseteste
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Grosseteste.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Grosseteste based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Grosseteste. Robert Grosseteste is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Grosseteste, Robert, et al.. (1987). De decem mandatis. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
11.
Grosseteste, Robert, et al.. (1986). De Cessatione Legalium. Oxford University Press eBooks.8 indexed citations
12.
Grosseteste, Robert & Pietro Rossi. (1981). Commentarius in Posteriorum analyticorum libros. L.S. Olschki eBooks.22 indexed citations
13.
Grosseteste, Robert, et al.. (1975). The Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle Volume I. Eustratius on book I and the anonymous scholia on books II, III, and IV (Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum, VI).1 indexed citations
14.
Dobson, E. & Robert Grosseteste. (1975). Moralities on the Gospels: a new source of Ancrene wisse.. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
15.
Grosseteste, Robert, et al.. (1973). The Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle in the Latin Translation of Robert Grosseteste, Bishop of Lincoln.7 indexed citations
Grosseteste, Robert & Richard C. Dales. (1963). Commentarius in Viii Libros Physicorum Aristotelis.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.