Robert G. Mrtek

754 total citations
34 papers, 455 citations indexed

About

Robert G. Mrtek is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Organic Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert G. Mrtek has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 455 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 4 papers in Organic Chemistry and 4 papers in Pharmaceutical Science. Recurrent topics in Robert G. Mrtek's work include Q Methodology Applications (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers) and Historical Medical Research and Treatments (3 papers). Robert G. Mrtek is often cited by papers focused on Q Methodology Applications (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers) and Historical Medical Research and Treatments (3 papers). Robert G. Mrtek collaborates with scholars based in United States, Iran and Belgium. Robert G. Mrtek's co-authors include Paula J. Willoughby, Paul T. Vaitkus, Sanjay Gandhi, Enrico Benedetti, Thelma E. Wiley, Malek G. Massad, Arnold R. Eiser, Paul S. Heckerling, Martin I. Blake and William S. Y. Wong and has published in prestigious journals such as Phytochemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Academic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Robert G. Mrtek

30 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert G. Mrtek United States 11 143 86 60 59 56 34 455
Robert E. Kuttner United States 14 35 0.2× 24 0.3× 413 6.9× 76 1.3× 11 0.2× 35 839
Jan de Lint United States 13 550 3.8× 26 0.3× 231 3.9× 84 1.4× 5 0.1× 26 1.1k
Rahmah Mohd Amin Malaysia 12 153 1.1× 59 0.7× 112 1.9× 68 1.2× 9 0.2× 43 614
Michele Cecchini France 9 86 0.6× 17 0.2× 85 1.4× 220 3.7× 3 0.1× 19 630
Judy Xu China 11 50 0.3× 20 0.2× 282 4.7× 45 0.8× 9 0.2× 19 731
Tácio de Mendonça Lima Brazil 13 29 0.2× 49 0.6× 110 1.8× 60 1.0× 6 0.1× 54 605
M. N. G. Dukes Netherlands 12 17 0.1× 36 0.4× 38 0.6× 123 2.1× 6 0.1× 37 520
Paul W. Jungnickel United States 12 26 0.2× 12 0.1× 135 2.3× 179 3.0× 8 0.1× 31 539
Margaret Newton United States 9 17 0.1× 48 0.6× 42 0.7× 34 0.6× 22 410
Rachel Peters United States 8 38 0.3× 16 0.2× 286 4.8× 73 1.2× 41 0.7× 11 604

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Mrtek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Mrtek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Mrtek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Mrtek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Mrtek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Mrtek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Mrtek. The network helps show where Robert G. Mrtek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert G. Mrtek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert G. Mrtek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert G. Mrtek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert G. Mrtek. Robert G. Mrtek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thammasitboon, Satid, et al.. (2008). Exploring Individual Opinions of Potential Evaluators in a 360-Degree Assessment: Four Distinct Viewpoints of a Competent Resident. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 20(4). 314–322. 10 indexed citations
2.
Mrtek, Robert G., et al.. (2005). Q Methodology to Measure Physician Satisfaction with Hospital Pathology Laboratory Services at a Midwest Academic Health Center Hospital. Laboratory Medicine. 36(6). 361–365. 5 indexed citations
4.
Gandhi, Sanjay, Paul T. Vaitkus, Malek G. Massad, et al.. (2002). Role of echocardiography in detecting portopulmonary hypertension in liver transplant candidates. Liver Transplantation. 8(11). 1051–1054. 68 indexed citations
5.
Willoughby, Paula J., et al.. (1998). Statistical Methodology: VII. Q‐Methodology, a Structural Analytic Approach to Medical Subjectivity. Academic Emergency Medicine. 5(10). 1032–1040. 56 indexed citations
6.
Tekian, Ara, et al.. (1996). Baseline longitudinal data of undergraduate medical students at risk. Academic Medicine. 71(10). S86–7. 11 indexed citations
7.
Mrtek, Robert G., et al.. (1994). Pharmacist Role Perceptions in Large Chain Pharmacy Organizations. Journal of Pharmaceutical Marketing & Management. 8(2). 59–71. 2 indexed citations
8.
Mrtek, Robert G., et al.. (1994). Use of Q-Technique to Examine Attitudes of Entering PharmacyStudents Toward Their Profession. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 58(1). 8–15. 20 indexed citations
9.
Valuck, Robert J., Suzanne Poirier, & Robert G. Mrtek. (1992). Patent medicine muckraking: influences on American pharmacy, social reform, and foreign authors.. PubMed. 34(4). 183–92. 1 indexed citations
10.
Mrtek, Robert G., et al.. (1991). Parsing the Paradigms: The Case for Human Values in the Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 55(1). 79–84. 1 indexed citations
11.
Mrtek, Robert G.. (1989). The American Institute of the History of Pharmacy and Its Role in Ethics. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 53(1). 68–72. 2 indexed citations
12.
Poirier, Suzanne & Robert G. Mrtek. (1985). Images of Pharmacy in the Arts: The Humanities in Pharmacy Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 49(1). 10–16. 3 indexed citations
13.
Mrtek, Robert G.. (1976). Pharmaceutical Education in These United States — An Interpretive Historical Essay of the Twentieth Century. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 40(4). 339–365. 17 indexed citations
14.
Rezler, Agnes G., Robert G. Mrtek, & Henri R. Manasse. (1976). Linking Career Choice to Personality Types: A Preliminary Analysis of Pharmacy Students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 40(2). 121–125. 3 indexed citations
15.
Mrtek, Robert G.. (1975). Pharmaceutical Calculations. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 64(6). 1083–1084. 4 indexed citations
16.
Rezler, Agnes G., et al.. (1975). Personality Correlates of Persistent High and Low Achievers. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 39(3). 236–238. 2 indexed citations
17.
Mrtek, Robert G., et al.. (1973). Microbiological Determination of Drug Partitioning II: Functional Dependence of Partition Coefficient on Drug Concentration. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 62(3). 420–423. 6 indexed citations
18.
Mrtek, Robert G., et al.. (1970). Evaluation of Student Accuracy in the Laboratory. I. Basic Principles of Pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 34(2). 214–218.
19.
Mrtek, Robert G., et al.. (1968). Biosynthesis of clavine alkaloids: Proton magnetic resonance studies. Phytochemistry. 7(9). 1535–1541. 4 indexed citations
20.
Mrtek, Robert G., Henry L. Crespi, Martin I. Blake, & Joseph Katz. (1967). Effect of deuterium oxide on the saprophytic culture of Claviceps II Alkaloid production. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 56(10). 1234–1238. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026