Robert Faist
About
In The Last Decade
Robert Faist
6 papers receiving 149 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Psychiatry and Mental health 64
- Artificial Intelligence 60
- Health Informatics 41
- Cognitive Neuroscience 30
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 21
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Faist
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Faist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Faist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Faist more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Faist
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Faist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Faist. The network helps show where Robert Faist may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Faist
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Faist. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Faist based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Faist. Robert Faist is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | A Statistical Approach for Visualizing the Quality of Multi-Hospital Data | 2 |
| 6 | 6 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.