Robert F. Weir

27 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

Robert F. Weir
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 368
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 273
  • General Health Professions 237
  • Clinical Psychology 93
  • Physiology 72
Replace Autumn Fiester with:
Autumn Fiester United States
Kirsten A. Riggan United States
Tjeerd Tymstra Netherlands
Hubert Doucet Canada
Lawrence J. Nelson United States
Inez D. de Beaufort Netherlands
Maureen Paul United States
Gil Siegal Israel
Raywat Deonandan Canada
Maxwell Brinsmead Australia
Robert F. Weir relative to Autumn Fiester United States Autumn Fiester's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Autumn Fiester · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert F. Weir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert F. Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert F. Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert F. Weir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert F. Weir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert F. Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert F. Weir. The network helps show where Robert F. Weir may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert F. Weir

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert F. Weir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert F. Weir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert F. Weir. Robert F. Weir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 58
2
The Stored Tissue Issue: Biomedical Research, Ethics, and Law in the Era of Genomic Medicine
18
3 16
4 64
5
Stored tissue samples : ethical, legal, and public policy implications
43
6
Affirming the decisions adolescents make about life and death.
74
7 63
8 21
9 2
10 16
11 25
12
Abating Treatment With Critically Ill Patients: Ethical and Legal Limits to the Medical Prolongation of Life
20
13 44
14 5
15 18
16 2
17 22
18 16
19
Death in literature
2
20 2

About Robert F. Weir

Robert F. Weir is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Pharmacy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (10 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (273 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (368 citations) and General Health Professions (237 citations). Robert F. Weir has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl L. Peters, Charles Peters, Jay R. Horton, Lauris C. Kaldjian, Thomas P. Duffy, Amy E. Sparks, Bradley J. Van Voorhis, Robert S. Olick, Jeffrey C. Murray and Mark A Graber. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026