Robert E. Stone

49 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Robert E. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Speech and Hearing 213
  • Physiology 674
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 146
  • Music 32
  • Signal Processing 72
Replace Kristine Tanner with:
Kristine Tanner United States
Kátia Nemr Brazil
K. Graamans Netherlands
Tzu‐Yu Hsiao Taiwan
Regina Helena Garcia Martins Brazil
Abdul‐Latif Hamdan Lebanon
Yolanda D. Heman‐Ackah United States
Janina K. Casper United States
Adam D. Rubin United States
Barbara H. Jacobson United States
Robert E. Stone relative to Kristine Tanner United States Kristine Tanner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Kristine Tanner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Stone. The network helps show where Robert E. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Stone Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993217
2 1967153
3 199591
4 200169
5 200366
6 200057
7 199146
8 200241
9 200733
10 199931
11 201327
12 199626
13 196426
14 199726
15 199925
16 195624
17 195218
18 196118
19 199716
20 199113

About Robert E. Stone

Robert E. Stone is a scholar working on Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Speech and Hearing, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Signal Processing, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Voice and Speech Disorders (17 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (10 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (4 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (3 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (213 citations), Physiology (674 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (146 citations), Music (32 citations) and Signal Processing (72 citations). Robert E. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Dreizen, Robert H. Ossoff, James L. Netterville, Thomas F. Cleveland, Johan Sundberg, Francisco Civantos, Mark S. Courey, Glendon M. Gardner, David L. Zealear and Tom D. Spies. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Voice, Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, Archives of Oral Biology, American Journal of Physical Anthropology and Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact