Robert C. Hsiung
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Clinical Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Thomas C. WetterDaniel E. FordBenjamin W. Van VoorheesThomas K. HoustonJoshua FogelSamantha AdamsChristoph U. LehmannJohn F. Hurdle
- Topics
- Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers)Mental Health via Writing (3 papers)Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Internet ResearchJournal of the American Medical Informatics AssociationComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Robert C. Hsiung
10 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Applied Psychology 109
- Social Psychology 103
- Sociology and Political Science 84
- Clinical Psychology 70
- General Health Professions 54
Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Hsiung
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Hsiung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Hsiung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Hsiung more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Hsiung
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Hsiung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Hsiung. The network helps show where Robert C. Hsiung may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert C. Hsiung
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert C. Hsiung. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert C. Hsiung based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert C. Hsiung. Robert C. Hsiung is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 58 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | E-therapy : case studies, guiding principles, and the clinical potential of the Internet | 29 |
| 7 | Suggested principles of professional ethics for the online provision of mental health services. | 6 |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 77 | |
| 10 | 8 |
About Robert C. Hsiung
Robert C. Hsiung is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Health Information Management and Social Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Mental Health via Writing (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (109 citations), Social Psychology (103 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Robert C. Hsiung has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas C. Wetter, Daniel E. Ford, Benjamin W. Van Voorhees, Thomas K. Houston, Joshua Fogel, Samantha Adams, Christoph U. Lehmann, John F. Hurdle, Carolyn Petersen and Kenneth W. Goodman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.