Robert C. Grant

22.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
90 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Robert C. Grant is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert C. Grant has authored 90 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Oncology, 28 papers in Cancer Research and 14 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Robert C. Grant's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (30 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (24 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (10 papers). Robert C. Grant is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (30 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (24 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (10 papers). Robert C. Grant collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Robert C. Grant's co-authors include Simon C. Ling, Aideen M. Moore, Ivan Diamond, Brian M. Feldman, Paul W. Wales, Paul B. Pencharz, Robert D. Wells, J E Larson, C R Cantor and Steven Gallinger and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Robert C. Grant

82 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Hit Papers

Defining consensu... 1970 2026 1988 2007 2014 1970 500 1000 1.5k

Peers

Robert C. Grant
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Sociology and Political Science 946
  • Molecular Biology 908
  • Oncology 908
  • Surgery 490
  • Cancer Research 412
Replace Xianming Tan with:
Xianming Tan United States
Martin C. Mahoney United States
Paulo S. Pinheiro United States
Mark Clements Sweden
Bo Lü United States
Karan P. Singh United States
Sharyl J. Nass United States
Chanita Hughes Halbert United States
David B. Preen Australia
Xianming Tan United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Robert C. Grant
Robert C. Grant · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Robert C. Grant
Robert C. Grant · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Grant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Grant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Grant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Grant. The network helps show where Robert C. Grant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert C. Grant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert C. Grant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert C. Grant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert C. Grant. Robert C. Grant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 6
7 1
8 1
9 2
10 4
11 7
12 0
13 2
14 0
15 1
16 6
17 5
18 12
19
Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies breakdown →
1824
20 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026