RL Sacco
About
In The Last Decade
RL Sacco
5 papers receiving 538 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Epidemiology 299
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 177
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 123
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 113
- Neurology 83
Countries citing papers authored by RL Sacco
This map shows the geographic impact of RL Sacco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RL Sacco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RL Sacco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by RL Sacco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by RL Sacco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RL Sacco. The network helps show where RL Sacco may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of RL Sacco
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of RL Sacco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of RL Sacco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with RL Sacco. RL Sacco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 390 | |
| 4 | Risk factors and outcomes for ischemic stroke. | 135 |
| 5 | Epidemiology of intracerebral hemorhage | 31 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.